A grating spectrometer is used to resolve wavelengths \(660.0 \mathrm{nm}\) and \(661.4 \mathrm{nm}\) in second order. (a) How many slits per centimeter must the grating have to produce both wavelengths in second order? (The answer is either a maximum or a minimum number of slits per centimeter.) (b) The minimum number of slits required to resolve two closely spaced lines is $N=\lambda /(m \Delta \lambda),\( where \)\lambda$ is the average of the two wavelengths, \(\Delta \lambda\) is the difference between the two wavelengths, and \(m\) is the order. What minimum number of slits must this grating have to resolve the lines in second order?

Short Answer

Expert verified
In summary: a) The number of slits per centimeter, S, needed to resolve both 660.0 nm and 661.4 nm wavelengths in the second order lies within the range of minimum and maximum values, which are determined by the angles close to 0° and 90°. b) The minimum number of slits, N, required to resolve the two closely spaced lines in the second order is approximately 236 slits.

Step by step solution

01

(a) Using the grating equation

We need to solve for the number of slits per centimeter that can resolve both wavelengths in the second order. We will use the grating equation first: $$d \cdot \sin{θ} = m \cdot \lambda $$ Where d is the distance between the slits, m is the order, and λ is the wavelength. We are given the wavelengths and the order (second order): - \(λ_1 = 660.0 nm\) - \(λ_2 = 661.4 nm\) - \(m = 2\) We want to find the number of slits per centimeter, so let this number be S. Since d (distance between slits) will be equal to \(1/S\). Then we can rewrite the grating equation as: $$\frac{1}{S} = m \cdot \lambda/\sin{θ} $$ We have two grating equations (one per wavelength) with two unknowns (S and θ). It will be easier to work with one unknown. Notice that the angles are close to each other as we are talking about very close wavelengths. We can then use the small-angle approximation: $$\tan{θ} ≈ \sin{θ} $$ So, S can be found by $$S = \frac{\lambda}{\tan{θ}}$$ We then get the final equation for the first step: $$\frac{\lambda_1 - \lambda_2}{\lambda_1 \tan{θ_1} - \lambda_2 \tan{θ_2}} = \frac{m}{S} $$ Now, let's find S:
02

(a) Solving for S

Now we can use the given wavelengths and the order to solve for the number of slits per centimeter (S): $$\frac{660.0 \mathrm{nm} - 661.4 \mathrm{nm}}{660.0 \mathrm{nm} \tan{θ_1} - 661.4 \mathrm{nm} \tan{θ_2}} = \frac{2}{S} $$ As the wavelengths are close to each other, the difference between θ_1 and θ_2 will also be small, and we can consider the angles to be equal: θ_1 ≈ θ_2: $$\frac{660.0 \mathrm{nm} - 661.4 \mathrm{nm}}{(660.0 \mathrm{nm} - 661.4 \mathrm{nm}) \tan{θ}} = \frac{2}{S} $$ Now, we get: $$ S = \frac{2}{\tan{θ}}$$ Since we want to find the minimum or maximum number of slits per centimeter, the angles will be either at min or max. To find the minimum S, we can use the maximum θ, which occurs when θ = 90°. In this case, S would be a minimum, and the angle will be very close to 90° but not exactly 90°: $$S_{min} = \frac{2}{\tan{(90°-\epsilon)}}$$ Similarly, to find the maximum S, we can use the minimum θ, which occurs when θ = 0°. In this case, the angle will be very close to 0°: $$S_{max} = \frac{2}{\tan{\epsilon}}$$ To find the range of values of S, we can say: $$S_{min} \leq S \leq S_{max}$$ Thus, the number of slits per centimeter will be in the range of minimum and maximum values allowed.
03

(b) Using the minimum resolving power formula

Now, we need to find the minimum number of slits required to resolve the two closely spaced lines using the given formula: $$N = \frac{\lambda}{m \Delta \lambda} $$ Where N is the minimum number of slits required, λ is the average of the two wavelengths, m is the order, and Δλ is the difference between the wavelengths. We are given these values: - \(λ_1 = 660.0 \mathrm{nm}\) - \(λ_2 = 661.4 \mathrm{nm}\) - \(m = 2\) First, let's find the average wavelength, λ: $$\lambda = \frac{660.0 \mathrm{nm} + 661.4 \mathrm{nm}}{2} = 660.7 \mathrm{nm}$$ Now, let's find the difference between the wavelengths, Δλ: $$\Delta \lambda = 661.4 \mathrm{nm} - 660.0 \mathrm{nm} = 1.4 \mathrm{nm} $$ Finally, we can substitute the values into the minimum resolving power formula: $$N = \frac{660.7 \mathrm{nm}}{2 \cdot 1.4 \mathrm{nm}} = \frac{660.7}{2.8} \approx 236$$ The grating must have at least 236 slits to resolve the lines in the second order.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

A grating \(1.600 \mathrm{cm}\) wide has exactly 12000 slits. The grating is used to resolve two nearly equal wavelengths in a light source: \(\lambda_{\mathrm{a}}=440.000 \mathrm{nm}\) and $\lambda_{\mathrm{b}}=440.936 \mathrm{nm}$ (a) How many orders of the lines can be seen with the grating? (b) What is the angular separation \(\theta_{b}-\theta_{a}\) between the lines in each order? (c) Which order best resolves the two lines? Explain.
Light incident on a pair of slits produces an interference pattern on a screen \(2.50 \mathrm{m}\) from the slits. If the slit separation is $0.0150 \mathrm{cm}$ and the distance between adjacent bright fringes in the pattern is \(0.760 \mathrm{cm},\) what is the wavelength of the light? [Hint: Is the small-angle approximation justified?]
A soap film has an index of refraction \(n=1.50 .\) The film is viewed in reflected light. (a) At a spot where the film thickness is $910.0 \mathrm{nm},$ which wavelengths are missing in the reflected light? (b) Which wavelengths are strongest in reflected light?
Instead of an anti reflective coating, suppose you wanted to coat a glass surface to enhance the reflection of visible light. Assuming that $1<n_{\text {coating }}<n_{\text {glass }},$ what should the minimum thickness of the coating be to maximize the reflected intensity for wavelength \(\lambda ?\)
When Albert turns on his small desk lamp, the light falling on his book has intensity \(I_{0} .\) When this is not quite enough, he turns the small lamp off and turns on a high-intensity lamp so that the light on his book has intensity \(4 I_{0} .\) What is the intensity of light falling on the book when Albert turns both lamps on? If there is more than one possibility, give the range of intensity possibilities.
See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free