A lens \((n=1.52)\) is coated with a magnesium fluoride film \((n=1.38) .\) (a) If the coating is to cause destructive interference in reflected light for \(\lambda=560 \mathrm{nm}\) (the peak of the solar spectrum), what should its minimum thickness be? (b) At what two wavelengths closest to 560 nm does the coating cause constructive interference in reflected light? (c) Is any visible light reflected? Explain.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Using the formula for destructive interference, we plug in the values: \(t = (\frac{1}{2}) \frac{560 \text{ nm}}{2(1.38 - 1)}\) \(t = \frac{1}{2} \frac{560 \text{ nm}}{0.76}\) \(t = 367.1 \text{ nm}\) So, the minimum thickness for destructive interference is 367.1 nm. (b) Find two closest wavelengths for constructive interference Using the formula for constructive interference and the value of t = 367.1 nm, we choose two closest integer values of m, one smaller (m=0), and one larger (m=1) than the value used in part (a): For m=0: \(\lambda = \frac{2(367.1 \text{ nm})(1.38 - 1)}{0}\) Since we can't divide by zero, there is no wavelength for m=0. For m=1: \(\lambda = \frac{2(367.1 \text{ nm})(1.38 - 1)}{1}\) \(\lambda = 758.6 \text{ nm}\) So, the two closest wavelengths for constructive interference are not possible for m=0, and 758.6 nm for m=1. (c) Is any visible light reflected? The visible light spectrum ranges from about 400 nm (violet) to 700 nm (red). Our constructive interference wavelength is 758.6 nm, which is outside the range of visible light. Therefore, no visible light is reflected.

Step by step solution

01

(a) Find minimum thickness for destructive interference

For a thin film, destructive interference occurs when the optical path difference between the two reflected rays is an odd multiple of λ/2. Using the formula for destructive interference: \(t = (m + \frac{1}{2}) \frac{\lambda}{2(n_{film} - n_{air})}\) Where t is the thickness of the film, m is an integer (for minimum thickness, we choose the smallest integer, m = 0), λ is the wavelength of light (λ = 560 nm), n_film = 1.38 (refractive index of the film), and n_air = 1 (refractive index of air). Now, we plug in the values: \(t = (\frac{1}{2}) \frac{560 \text{ nm}}{2(1.38 - 1)}\) Calculate the thickness t.
02

(b) Find two closest wavelengths for constructive interference

For a thin film, constructive interference occurs when the optical path difference between the two reflected rays is an integer multiple of λ. Using the formula for constructive interference: \(t = m \frac{\lambda}{2(n_{film} - n_{air})}\) We can rearrange the formula to solve for λ: \(\lambda = \frac{2t(n_{film} - n_{air})}{m}\) Using the t obtained in part (a), we can find two wavelengths on either side of 560 nm that cause constructive interference. Choose two closest integer values of m, one smaller and one larger than the value used in part (a). Calculate the two wavelengths corresponding to these m values.
03

(c) Determine if any visible light is reflected

The visible light spectrum ranges from about 400 nm (violet) to 700 nm (red). Compare the wavelengths obtained in part (b) with this range. If any of the wavelengths fall within the visible light spectrum, then visible light is reflected. Otherwise, no visible light is reflected. Explain your conclusion based on the calculated wavelengths.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Show that the interference fringes in a double-slit experiment are equally spaced on a distant screen near the center of the interference pattern. [Hint: Use the small angle approximation for \(\boldsymbol{\theta} .]\)
Light of wavelength 589 nm incident on a pair of slits produces an interference pattern on a distant screen in which the separation between adjacent bright fringes at the center of the pattern is \(0.530 \mathrm{cm} .\) A second light source, when incident on the same pair of slits, produces an interference pattern on the same screen with a separation of $0.640 \mathrm{cm}$ between adjacent bright fringes at the center of the pattern. What is the wavelength of the second source? [Hint: Is the small-angle approximation justified?]
If you shine a laser (wavelength \(0.60 \mu \mathrm{m}\) ) with a small aperture at the Moon, diffraction makes the beam spread out and the spot on the Moon is large. Making the aperture smaller only makes the spot on the Moon larger. On the other hand, shining a wide searchlight at the Moon can't make a tiny spot- the spot on the Moon is at least as wide as the searchlight. What is the radius of the smallest possible spot you can make on the Moon by shining a light from Earth? Assume the light is perfectly parallel before passing through a circular aperture.
A red line (wavelength \(630 \mathrm{nm}\) ) in the third order overlaps with a blue line in the fourth order for a particular grating. What is the wavelength of the blue line?
A thin film of oil \((n=1.50)\) is spread over a puddle of water \((n=1.33) .\) In a region where the film looks red from directly above $(\lambda=630 \mathrm{nm}),$ what is the minimum possible thickness of the film? (tutorial: thin film).
See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free