Follow the steps outlined in this problem to estimate the time lag (predicted classically but not observed experimentally) in the photoelectric effect. Let the intensity of the incident radiation be $0.01 \mathrm{W} / \mathrm{m}^{2} .\( (a) If the area of the atom is \)(0.1 \mathrm{nm})^{2},$ find the energy per second falling on the atom. (b) If the work function is 2.0 eV, how long would it take (classically) for enough energy to fall on this area to liberate one photoelectron? (c) Explain briefly, using the photon model, why this time lag is not observed.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Why is this time lag not observed using the photon model? Answer: Classically, it would take 32 seconds to liberate one photoelectron. However, this time lag is not observed in the photon model because the energy transfer from a photon to an electron is instantaneous and all-or-nothing, unlike the gradual energy transfer predicted by classical physics.

Step by step solution

01

1. Calculate the energy falling on the atom per second.

To find the energy falling on the atom per second, we will first calculate the energy received per square meter and then multiply it with the area of the atom. We have given the intensity of the radiation as \(0.01 \mathrm{W/m^2}\). The area of the atom is \((0.1 \mathrm{nm})^2\). First, we need to convert the area of the atom from nanometers to meters:\((0.1 \times 10^{-9} \mathrm{m})^2 = 10^{-18} \mathrm{m^2}\). Now we can find the energy falling on the atom per second: \(0.01 \mathrm{\frac{W}{m^2}} \times 10^{-18} \mathrm{m^2} = 10^{-20} \mathrm{W}\).
02

2. Calculate the time to liberate one photoelectron.

We are given the work function as 2.0 eV. First, we need to convert this energy to Joules using the conversion factor \(1 \mathrm{eV} = 1.6 \times 10^{-19} \mathrm{J}\): \(2.0 \mathrm{eV} \times 1.6 \times 10^{-19} \mathrm{\frac{J}{eV}} = 3.2 \times 10^{-19} \mathrm{J}\). Next, we want to find out how long it would take for this amount of energy to fall on the atom. We can do this by dividing the required energy by the energy per second falling on the atom: \(\frac{3.2 \times 10^{-19} \mathrm{J}}{10^{-20} \mathrm{W}} = 3.2 \times 10^1 \mathrm{s}\) So, classically, it would take 32 seconds to liberate one photoelectron.
03

3. Explain why this time lag is not observed using the photon model.

According to the photon model, a photoelectron is emitted instantaneously when a single photon having energy equal to or greater than the work function of the material interacts with an electron. This is because, in the quantum model, the energy of light is quantized and packaged into photons. When a photon interacts with an electron, it transfers its entire energy to the electron instantaneously. If the energy of the photon is greater than the work function, the electron is immediately ejected from the atom as a photoelectron. Therefore, there is no time lag observed because the energy transfer happens instantaneously in an all-or-nothing manner, unlike the gradual energy transfer predicted by the classical model.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Photons with a wavelength of 400 nm are incident on an unknown metal, and electrons are ejected from the metal. However, when photons with a wavelength of \(700 \mathrm{nm}\) are incident on the metal, no electrons are ejected. (a) Could this metal be cesium with a work function of \(1.8 \mathrm{eV} ?\) (b) Could this metal be tungsten with a work function of 4.6 eV? (c) Calculate the maximum kinetic energy of the ejected electrons for each possible metal when 200 -nm photons are incident on it.
In a color TV tube, electrons are accelerated through a potential difference of \(20.0 \mathrm{kV} .\) Some of the electrons strike the metal mask (instead of the phosphor dots behind holes in the mask), causing x-rays to be emitted. What is the smallest wavelength of the \(x\) -rays emitted?
A thin aluminum target is illuminated with photons of wavelength \(\lambda\). A detector is placed at \(90.0^{\circ}\) to the direction of the incident photons. The scattered photons detected are found to have half the energy of the incident photons. (a) Find \(\lambda\). (b) What is the wavelength of backscattered photons (detector at \(\left.180^{\circ}\right) ?\) (c) What (if anything) would change if a copper target were used instead of an aluminum one?
Photons of wavelength \(350 \mathrm{nm}\) are incident on a metal plate in a photocell and electrons are ejected. A stopping potential of \(1.10 \mathrm{V}\) is able to just prevent any of the ejected electrons from reaching the opposite electrode. What is the maximum wavelength of photons that will eject electrons from this metal?
The photoelectric effect is studied using a tungsten target. The work function of tungsten is 4.5 eV. The incident photons have energy \(4.8 \mathrm{eV} .\) (a) What is the threshold frequency? (b) What is the stopping potential? (c) Explain why, in classical physics, no threshold frequency is expected.
See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free