A particular transparent diffraction grating is ruled with 5,500 lines per centimeter, and \(2.5 \mathrm{~cm}\) of it is used in a simple spectrometer having a source slit, collimating lens, and telescope. At what angles are the sodium D lines \((\lambda=589.0\) and \(589.6 \mathrm{~nm})\) found if the grating is illuminated at normal incidence? What is the dispersion in minutes of arc per nanometer and the theoretical resolution at each of these angular positions?

Short Answer

Expert verified
Now, we should convert the distance to meters for easier calculations: $$d = \frac{1}{5500} \mathrm{~cm} \times \frac{1\mathrm{~m}}{100\mathrm{~cm}} = 1.818\times10^{-5} \mathrm{~m}$$ #Step 2: Solve for Angles of Diffraction for Sodium D Lines# Using the grating equation, we can solve for the angles of diffraction for the sodium D lines. Let's start with \(\lambda_1 = 589.0 \mathrm{~nm}\): $$n\lambda_1 = d \sin(\theta_1)$$ $$\theta_1 = \sin^{-1}\left(\frac{n\lambda_1}{d}\right)$$ We must check for each order of diffraction (n) if it produces a valid angle between 0° and 90°. Let's calculate the angles for both D lines and the first two orders of diffraction (n = 1 and n = 2): - For \(\lambda_1 = 589.0 \mathrm{~nm}\) and n = 1: $$\theta_1 = \sin^{-1}\left(\frac{1\cdot(589.0 \times 10^{-9} \mathrm{~m})}{1.818\times10^{-5} \mathrm{~m}}\right) \approx 18.98°$$ - For \(\lambda_1 = 589.0 \mathrm{~nm}\) and n = 2: $$\theta_1 = \sin^{-1}\left(\frac{2\cdot(589.0 \times 10^{-9} \mathrm{~m})}{1.818\times10^{-5} \mathrm{~m}}\right)$$ This calculation results in a value greater than 1 inside the sin inverse function, which means there is no second-order diffraction for \(\lambda_1\). - For \(\lambda_2 = 589.6 \mathrm{~nm}\) and n = 1: $$\theta_2 = \sin^{-1}\left(\frac{1\cdot(589.6 \times 10^{-9} \mathrm{~m})}{1.818\times10^{-5} \mathrm{~m}}\right) \approx 18.99°$$ - For \(\lambda_2 = 589.6 \mathrm{~nm}\) and n = 2: Again, there is no second-order diffraction for \(\lambda_2\). So, the angles of diffraction for the first-order sodium D lines are approximately 18.98° and 18.99°. #Step 3: Calculate Angular Dispersion# Now, we can calculate the angular dispersion of the grating using the derivative of the grating equation. For simplicity, let's take the first order (n = 1): $$\frac{d\theta}{d\lambda} = \frac{1}{d\cos(\theta)}$$ Using the angle calculated for \(\lambda_1 = 589.0 \mathrm{~nm}\): $$\frac{d\theta}{d\lambda} = \frac{1}{(1.818\times10^{-5} \mathrm{~m})\cos(18.98°)} \approx 4.806 \times 10^6 \mathrm{~m}^{-1}$$ The angular dispersion for the first-order sodium D lines is approximately \(4.806 \times 10^6 \mathrm{~m}^{-1}\). #Step 4: Calculate Theoretical Resolution# Finally, we can calculate the theoretical resolution of the grating. First, let's find the total number of rulings (N) in the grating. Assuming that the grating is 1 cm wide: $$N = 1\mathrm{~cm} \times 5500\frac{\text{lines}}{\mathrm{cm}} = 5500$$ Using the previously mentioned equation for resolution and the first order (n = 1): $$R = nN = 1\cdot 5500 = 5500$$ The theoretical resolution of the grating for the first-order sodium D lines is 5,500.

Step by step solution

01

Calculate the Grating Spacing

First, we need to calculate the grating spacing \(d\). We know that there are 5,500 lines per centimeter, so the distance between the rulings is: $$d = \frac{1}{5500} \mathrm{~cm}$$

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Show that the fraction of the total energy in the circular-aperture diffraction pattern out to the radius specified by \(u_{\operatorname{msx}}\) is $$ \frac{1}{2} \int_{0}^{u_{\max }}\left[\frac{2 J_{1}(u)}{u}\right]^{2} u d u=1-J_{0}^{2}\left(u_{\max }\right)-J_{1}^{2}\left(u_{\max }\right) . $$ Hence, verify the final column of Table \(10.2\).

For the \(N\)-slit grating at normal incidence, devise elementary arguments, not involving integrals or a formal summation like \((10.7 .5)\), to show that (a) the principal interference maxima occur for $$ b \sin \theta_{0}=m \lambda $$ where \(m\) is an integer; \((b)\) the nulls adjacent to a particular principal maximum are displaced in angle from the maximum by \(\Delta \theta_{0}\) such that $$ \left(\frac{N}{2} b \cos \theta_{*}\right) \Delta \theta_{\varphi}=\pm \frac{\lambda}{2} $$ (c) hence, the resolving power is \(m N\).

Work out the theory of double-slit Fraunhofer diffraction when the two slits have different widths \(a_{1}=2 a_{2}\) and \(b\), the distance between slit centers, is \(4 a_{2}\).

The largest fully steerable radio telescope at the National Radio Astronomy Observatory (Green Bank, W.Va.) has a parabolic mirror \(140 \mathrm{ft}\) in diameter. Approximately what angular resolution does it have for the 1,420-M Hz \((21-\mathrm{cm})\) line radiated by interstellar atomic hydrogen? (In practice, the sensitivity of the detector at the parabola focus is not isotropic. A careful analysis would include a nonuniform aperture-illumination function analogous to Probs. \(10.4 .8\) and 10.4.9.) The mirror was constructed to conform to an ideal paraboloid within a tolerance of \(0.030 \mathrm{in}\). What minimum wavelength can be used with this instrument if the criterion is that the construction errors not exceed \(\lambda / 8\) ? What is the approximate resolution for the minimum wavelength? Answer: 21 minutes of arc; \(\lambda=6 \mathrm{~mm}, 0.6\) minute of arc.

A radio-frequency antenna (such as a TV antenna) may be thought of semiquantitatively as an aperture with dimensions comparable to the physical dimensions (usually of the order of a wavelength). How far away from the antenna, expressed in wavelengths, must one be for the Fraunhofer case to be valid? Compare with the case for a pinhole of diameter \(0.1 \mathrm{~mm}\) for visible wavelengths.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free