You wish to construct a pinhole camera (no lens) with \(10 \mathrm{~cm}\) separation between pinhole and film plane. The film is sensitive to visible light \((\lambda \sim 500 \mathrm{~nm}) .\) What pinhole diameter would you choose for optimum resolution, i.e., smallest photographic image of a point object, and what order of magnitude of angular resolution would be obtained?

Short Answer

Expert verified
Answer: The optimal pinhole diameter for this camera configuration is approximately \(6.1 \times 10^{-7} \mathrm{~m}\) and the order of magnitude of angular resolution is around \(1 \times 10^{-3}\) radians.

Step by step solution

01

Recall the Rayleigh criterion formula

The Rayleigh criterion states that when the central maximum of the diffraction pattern of one light source overlaps with the first minimum of the diffraction pattern of another light source, the two sources are barely resolved. The Rayleigh criterion formula for a pinhole camera is given by: \(θ_{\text{min}} = 1.22 * \frac{\lambda}{D}\), where \(θ_{\text{min}}\) is the minimum angular separation between two light sources, \(\lambda\) is the wavelength of light (here, visible light is around 500 nm), and \(D\) is the pinhole diameter. In this case, we'll need to rearrange this equation to solve for \(D\).
02

Rearrange the Rayleigh criterion formula to solve for the pinhole diameter

Rearranging the Rayleigh criterion formula to solve for the pinhole diameter \(D\): \(D = \frac{1.22 * \lambda}{θ_{\text{min}}}\) Since we want the smallest possible image of a point object, we assume that the minimum angular separation is equal to the angular resolution. In other words, \(θ_{\text{min}} = θ_{\text{res}}\).
03

Calculate the optimal pinhole diameter

We now have the formula to calculate the optimal pinhole diameter for the given camera configuration. Given a 10 cm distance between the pinhole and the film plane, the optimal diameter is given by: \(D = \frac{1.22 * \lambda}{θ_{\text{res}}}\) Plug in the given value of \(\lambda = 500 \mathrm{~nm}\): \(D = \frac{1.22 * (500 \times 10^{-9} \mathrm{~m})}{θ_{\text{res}}}\) To find the optimal pinhole diameter, we'll need to minimize the value of \(θ_{\text{res}}\). Since \(\frac{d}{\mathrm{tan}(θ)}\) represents the linear size of an image (where d is the distance between the pinhole and the film plane), the best resolution occurs when the linear size of the image has a minimum value, i.e., \(Δx = θ_{\text{res}} \times d\) is minimum. Taking the derivative of \(Δx\) with respect to \(θ_{\text{res}}\) and setting it to zero, we get: \(\frac{d[θ_{\text{res}} \times d]}{dθ_{\text{res}}} = d = 0\) This implies that \(θ_{\text{res}} = \frac{1.22 * \lambda}{D} \approx \frac{\lambda}{D}\) is minimum in our situation. Therefore, we get: \(D = 1.22 * \lambda = 1.22 * (500 \times 10^{-9} \mathrm{~m})\) Now, calculate the value of \(D\): \(D \approx 6.1 \times 10^{-7} \mathrm{~m}\) So the optimal pinhole diameter is approximately \(6.1 \times 10^{-7} \mathrm{~m}\).
04

Calculate the angular resolution

Now that we know the optimal pinhole diameter, we can calculate the order of magnitude of angular resolution. From the Rayleigh criterion formula, we have: \(θ_{\text{res}} = \frac{1.22 * \lambda}{D}\) Plug in the known values of \(\lambda = 500 \mathrm{~nm}\) and \(D = 6.1 \times 10^{-7} \mathrm{~m}\): \(θ_{\text{res}} = \frac{1.22 * (500 \times 10^{-9} \mathrm{~m})}{6.1 \times 10^{-7} \mathrm{~m}}\) Calculate the value of \(θ_{\text{res}}\): \(θ_{\text{res}} \approx 1 \times 10^{-3} \,\mathrm{radians}\) Thus, the order of magnitude of angular resolution is around \(1 \times 10^{-3}\) radians.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Develop the Fresnel diffraction of a slit using a coordinate system fixed to the center of the slit (but source and observation point may be off axis). Show that the phase exponent \(\kappa\left(r_{s}+r_{o}\right)\) in the integrand of the Kirchhoff integral contains both a linear and a quadratic term in the aperture coordinate. (Under what conditions can the quadratic term be neglected, giving the Fraunhofer limit?) By completing the square, show that the "moving" coordinate system used in this section (Fig. 11.2.1) eliminates the linear term, i.e., results in a pure quadratic phase exponent and the conventional Fresnel integrals.

Prove formally the limiting values of the Fresnel integrals for \(u \rightarrow \infty\), that is, $$ \int_{0}^{\infty} \cos \frac{\pi}{2} u^{2} d u=\int_{0}^{\infty} \sin \frac{\pi}{2} u^{2} d u=\frac{1}{2} $$

A step function is a function whose value changes abruptly from zero to some constant. In general, this abrupt rise takes place over a small but finite interval of the argument. Also, the function may overshoot before converging to its final constant value. The rise-inlerval (or rise-time if the abscissa happens to be time) is usually defined as the increment in the argument over which the function changes from 10 to 90 percent of its final value. What is the rise-interval \(\delta u\) of the straight-edge intensity diffraction pattern? To what distance in the observation plane does this correspond for the special case of \(R_{\mathrm{s}}=R_{\mathrm{o}}=2 \mathrm{~m}\), \(\lambda=500 \mathrm{~nm}\) ? What is the percentage overshoot? Answer: \(\delta u=1.17, \delta x=1.17 \mathrm{~mm} ; 37\) percent.

A zone plate is a screen made by blackening even-numbered (alternatively, oddnumbered) zones whose outer radii are given by \(\rho_{n}{ }^{2}=n \lambda R_{o}(n=1,2, \ldots) .\) Plane monochromatic waves incident on it are in effect focused on a point \(P_{o}\), distant \(R_{o}\) from the zone plate, since the wavefronts arriving at \(P_{0}\) from the odd-numbered zones are all in phase. Show that a sequence of such focus points exist. Show also that the zone plate focuses a point source at a distance \(p\) into a point image at a distance \(q\), where \(p\) and \(q\) are related by the familiar lens equation $$ \frac{1}{p}+\frac{1}{q}=\frac{1}{f}=\frac{\lambda}{\rho_{1}{ }^{2}} $$ Does an equation of this form hold for each of the other images?

In the paraxial approximation, the Fresnel diffraction pattern of a slit may be specified uniquely by two normalized parameters: (1) the width of the slit measured as $$ \Delta u=\left[\frac{2}{\lambda}\left(\frac{1}{R_{s}}+\frac{1}{R_{0}}\right)\right]^{1 / 2} a $$ or alternatively the number \(n=(\Delta u)^{2} / 8\) of Fresnel linear zones unmasked, and (2) the angle of the observation point off the axis measured as \(\theta / \theta_{0}\) where \(\theta_{0}=\lambda / a\). Compare the diffraction patterns when \((a) a=1 \mathrm{~mm}, R_{s}=R_{0}=1 \mathrm{~m}\) and, \((b) a=2 \mathrm{~mm}, R_{\varepsilon}=R_{0}=4 \mathrm{~m}\).

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free