Chapter 11: Problem 8
What is the effect of an obstacle (as opposed to an aperture) in the Fraunhofer diffraction limit?
Chapter 11: Problem 8
What is the effect of an obstacle (as opposed to an aperture) in the Fraunhofer diffraction limit?
All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.
Get started for freeIn the paraxial approximation, the Fresnel diffraction pattern of a slit may be specified uniquely by two normalized parameters: (1) the width of the slit measured as $$ \Delta u=\left[\frac{2}{\lambda}\left(\frac{1}{R_{s}}+\frac{1}{R_{0}}\right)\right]^{1 / 2} a $$ or alternatively the number \(n=(\Delta u)^{2} / 8\) of Fresnel linear zones unmasked, and (2) the angle of the observation point off the axis measured as \(\theta / \theta_{0}\) where \(\theta_{0}=\lambda / a\). Compare the diffraction patterns when \((a) a=1 \mathrm{~mm}, R_{s}=R_{0}=1 \mathrm{~m}\) and, \((b) a=2 \mathrm{~mm}, R_{\varepsilon}=R_{0}=4 \mathrm{~m}\).
A step function is a function whose value changes abruptly from zero to some constant. In general, this abrupt rise takes place over a small but finite interval of the argument. Also, the function may overshoot before converging to its final constant value. The rise-inlerval (or rise-time if the abscissa happens to be time) is usually defined as the increment in the argument over which the function changes from 10 to 90 percent of its final value. What is the rise-interval \(\delta u\) of the straight-edge intensity diffraction pattern? To what distance in the observation plane does this correspond for the special case of \(R_{\mathrm{s}}=R_{\mathrm{o}}=2 \mathrm{~m}\), \(\lambda=500 \mathrm{~nm}\) ? What is the percentage overshoot? Answer: \(\delta u=1.17, \delta x=1.17 \mathrm{~mm} ; 37\) percent.
You wish to construct a pinhole camera (no lens) with \(10 \mathrm{~cm}\) separation between pinhole and film plane. The film is sensitive to visible light \((\lambda \sim 500 \mathrm{~nm}) .\) What pinhole diameter would you choose for optimum resolution, i.e., smallest photographic image of a point object, and what order of magnitude of angular resolution would be obtained?
A zone plate is a screen made by blackening even-numbered (alternatively, oddnumbered) zones whose outer radii are given by \(\rho_{n}{ }^{2}=n \lambda R_{o}(n=1,2, \ldots) .\) Plane monochromatic waves incident on it are in effect focused on a point \(P_{o}\), distant \(R_{o}\) from the zone plate, since the wavefronts arriving at \(P_{0}\) from the odd-numbered zones are all in phase. Show that a sequence of such focus points exist. Show also that the zone plate focuses a point source at a distance \(p\) into a point image at a distance \(q\), where \(p\) and \(q\) are related by the familiar lens equation $$ \frac{1}{p}+\frac{1}{q}=\frac{1}{f}=\frac{\lambda}{\rho_{1}{ }^{2}} $$ Does an equation of this form hold for each of the other images?
Prove formally the limiting values of the Fresnel integrals for \(u \rightarrow \infty\), that is, $$ \int_{0}^{\infty} \cos \frac{\pi}{2} u^{2} d u=\int_{0}^{\infty} \sin \frac{\pi}{2} u^{2} d u=\frac{1}{2} $$
What do you think about this solution?
We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.