Develop Poynting's theorem for the general material medium of relative permittivity \(\kappa_{\&}\) and permeability \(\kappa_{m}\) introduced in Prob. \(8.2 .2\); i.e., substitute the Maxwell curl equations \((8.2 .18)\) and \((8.2 .20)\) in the expansion of \(\nabla \cdot(\mathbf{E} \times \mathbf{H})\) to obtain $$ \oint_{S}(\mathbf{E} \times \mathbf{H}) \cdot d \mathbf{S}+\int_{V}\left(\mathbf{E} \cdot \frac{\partial \mathbf{D}}{\partial t}+\mathbf{H} \cdot \frac{\partial \mathbf{B}}{\partial t}\right) d v+\int_{V} \mathbf{E} \cdot \mathbf{J} d v=0 $$ from which it follows that the Poynting vector is $$ s=\mathbf{E} \times \mathbf{H} $$ and the energy density is $$ \begin{aligned} \left(W_{1}\right)_{\text {leld }} &=\frac{1}{2} \mathbf{E} \cdot \mathbf{D}+\frac{1}{2} \mathbf{H} \cdot \mathbf{B} \\ &=\frac{1}{2} \kappa_{\ell} \epsilon_{0} E^{2}+\frac{1}{2 \kappa_{\mathrm{m}} \mu_{0}} B^{2} \end{aligned} $$ What restrictions on \(\kappa_{\&}\) and \(\kappa_{m}\) are necessary to obtain \((8.4 .24)\) ?

Short Answer

Expert verified
In summary, the Poynting vector for a general material medium is given by \(\mathbf{E} \times \mathbf{H}\) and the energy density is given by \(\frac{1}{2} \kappa_{\&} \epsilon_{0} E^{2}+\frac{1}{2 \kappa_{m} \mu_{0}} B^{2}\). To obtain equation (8.4.24), \(\frac{1}{2} \epsilon_{0} E^{2}+\frac{1}{2 \mu_{0}} B^{2}\), we need the restrictions on relative permittivity \(\kappa_{\&}\) and permeability \(\kappa_{m}\) to be both equal to 1.

Step by step solution

01

Develop Poynting's theorem for the general material medium

We are given the Maxwell curl equations \((8.2 .18)\) and \((8.2 .20)\) and have to substitute these in the expansion of \(\nabla \cdot(\mathbf{E} \times \mathbf{H})\). The Maxwell curl equations are: $$ \nabla \times \mathbf{E} = -\frac{\partial \mathbf{B}}{\partial t} $$ $$ \nabla \times \mathbf{H} = \mathbf{J} + \frac{\partial \mathbf{D}}{\partial t} $$ We know that \(\mathbf{D} = \kappa_{\&} \epsilon_0 \mathbf{E}\) and \(\mathbf{B} = \kappa_{m} \mu_0 \mathbf{H}\). Substituting these relations in the above equations, we get: $$ \nabla \times \mathbf{E} = -\frac{\partial (\kappa_{m}\mu_0 \mathbf{H})}{\partial t} $$ $$ \nabla \times \mathbf{H} = \mathbf{J} + \frac{\partial (\kappa_{\&} \epsilon_0 \mathbf{E})}{\partial t} $$ Now, we take the divergence of the Poynting vector: $$ \nabla \cdot (\mathbf{E} \times \mathbf{H}) = \nabla \cdot (\mathbf{E} \times (\frac{1}{\kappa_{m}\mu_0} \mathbf{B})) $$ Substituting the Maxwell curl equations, we obtain Poynting's theorem as: $$ \oint_{S}(\mathbf{E} \times \mathbf{H}) \cdot d \mathbf{S} + \int_{V} \left(\mathbf{E} \cdot \frac{\partial \mathbf{D}}{\partial t} + \mathbf{H} \cdot \frac{\partial \mathbf{B}}{\partial t}\right) d v + \int_{V} \mathbf{E} \cdot \mathbf{J} d v = 0 $$
02

Find the Poynting vector and energy density

From the Poynting's theorem, we can find the Poynting vector as: $$ s = \mathbf{E} \times \mathbf{H} $$ The energy density can be found by considering the two components in the above integral expression: $$ \begin{aligned} \left(W_{1}\right)_{\text {leld }} &=\frac{1}{2} \mathbf{E} \cdot \mathbf{D}+\frac{1}{2} \mathbf{H} \cdot \mathbf{B} \\ &=\frac{1}{2} \kappa_{\ell} \epsilon_{0} E^{2}+\frac{1}{2 \kappa_{\mathrm{m}} \mu_{0}} B^{2} \end{aligned} $$
03

Restrictions on \(\kappa_{\&}\) and \(\kappa_{m}\)

Now, we need to find the restrictions on \(\kappa_{\&}\) and \(\kappa_{m}\) necessary to obtain equation \((8.4 .24)\). Equation \((8.4 .24)\) is given by: $$ \frac{1}{2} \epsilon_{0} E^{2}+\frac{1}{2 \mu_{0}} B^{2} $$ Comparing this equation with the energy density equation derived above, we can see that the restrictions on \(\kappa_{\&}\) and \(\kappa_{m}\) are given by: $$ \kappa_{\&} = 1 $$ $$ \kappa_{m} = 1 $$ We need these restrictions for the energy density equation to match with equation \((8.4 .24)\).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Consider total reflection at an interface between two nonmagnetic media, with relative refractive index \(n=c_{1} / c_{2}<1\). For angles of incidence \(\theta_{1}\) exceeding the critical angle of (8.6.42), Snell's law gives $$ \sin \theta_{2}=\frac{\sin \theta_{1}}{n}>1, $$ which implies that \(\theta_{2}\) is a complex angle with an imaginary cosine, $$ \cos \theta_{2}=\left(1-\sin ^{2} \theta_{2}\right)^{1 / 2}=j\left(\frac{\sin ^{2} \theta_{1}}{n^{2}}-1\right)^{1 / 2} $$ Substitute these relations in the case I reflection coefficient (8.6.28) to establish $$ R_{\mathbf{E} \perp}=e^{-i 2 \phi_{\perp}}, $$ where $$ \tan \phi_{\perp}=\frac{\left(\sin ^{2} \theta_{1}-n^{2}\right)^{1 / x}}{\cos \theta_{1}} $$ That is, the magnitude of the reflection coefficient is unity, but the phase of the reflected wave depends upon angle. Similarly show for case II from (8.6.36), that \(R_{\text {III }}=e^{-\text {jod with }}\) $$ \tan \phi \|=\frac{\left(\sin ^{2} \theta_{1}-n^{2}\right)^{1 / 2}}{n^{2} \cos \theta_{1}}=\frac{1}{n^{2}} \tan \phi_{\perp} . $$ Note that the two phase shifts are different, so that in general the state of polarization of an incident wave is altered.

An artificial line can be made from a number of lumped inductors and capacitors by arranging them alternately as shown in the diagram. The circuit can be analyzed in terms of an elementary \(T\) section, also shown. Show that in the low-frequency limit the characteristic impedance of the artificial line of arbitrary length is $$ Z_{0}=\left(\frac{L}{C}\right)^{1 / 2} $$ Artifici. ll liac Prob, \(8,1.12\) and that the speed of propagation, in sections per second, is $$ c^{\prime}=\frac{1}{(L C)^{\mathrm{t} / 3}} $$ Further show that the line does not transmit waves at frequencies greater than the culoff frequency $$ \omega_{c}=\frac{2}{(L C)^{1 / 2}} $$ How do \(Z_{4}\) and \(c^{\prime}\) vary with frequency near \(\omega_{c} ?\) What if each inductor has a small amount of stray capacitance in parallel with it? What if adjacent inductors are coupled by mutual inductance? What practical applications might such circuits have?

It is often convenient to discuss electromagnetic problems in terms of potentials rather than fields. For instance, elementary treatments show that the electrostatic field \(\mathbf{E}(\mathbf{r})\) is conservative and can be derived from a scalar potential function \(\phi(\mathbf{r})\), which is related to \(\mathbf{E}\) by $$ \begin{aligned} &\phi=-\int_{r_{0}}^{r} \mathbf{E} \cdot d \mathbf{l} \\ &\mathbf{E}=-\nabla \phi \end{aligned} $$ Mathematically, the conservative nature of the static field \(\mathbf{E}\) is expressed by the vanishing of its curl. Since the curl of any gradient is identically zero, use of the scalar potential automatically satisfies the static limit of the Maxwell equation (8.2.2); the other constraint on \(\phi\) is Gauss' law (8.2.1). Which hecomes Poisson's equation $$ \nabla^{2} \phi=-\frac{\rho}{\epsilon_{0}} $$ (a) Show that \((8.2 .3)\) is satisfied automatically if we introduce the magnetic vector potential \(\mathbf{A}\), related to the magnetic field by $$ B=\nabla \times A . $$ (b) Show that in the general (nonstatic) case, the electric field is given in terms of the scalar and vector potentials by $$ \mathbf{E}=-\nabla \phi-\frac{\partial \mathbf{A}}{\partial t} $$ (c) Complete the prescription of \(\mathbf{A}\) by defining its divergence by the Lorents condition $$ \boldsymbol{\nabla} \cdot \mathbf{A}=-\frac{1}{c^{2}} \frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t} $$ and show that the two potentials obey the symmetrical inhomogeneous wave equations $$ \begin{aligned} &\nabla^{2} \phi-\frac{1}{c^{2}} \frac{\partial^{2} \phi}{\partial t^{2}}=-\frac{\rho}{\epsilon_{0}} \\ &\nabla^{2} \mathbf{A}-\frac{1}{c^{2}} \frac{\partial^{2} \mathbf{A}}{\partial t^{2}}=-\mu_{0} \mathbf{J} . \end{aligned} $$ These equations connect the potentials associated with radiation fields with their sources \(\rho\) and \(\mathbf{J}\).

Find the general solution of the scalar wave equation in spherical coordinates by separation of variables. [The radial functions are called spherical Bessel funclions z, related to ordinary Bessel functions \(Z\) of half-integral order by $$ z_{l}(\kappa r)=\left(\frac{\pi}{2 \kappa r}\right)^{1 / 2} Z_{l+\\}}(\kappa r) $$ The polar-angle functions are the associated Legendre polynomials \(P_{i}^{m}(\cos \theta)\).] † See Panofsky and Phillips, op. cit., pp. 229-233.

Use the general form of Maxwell's equations (8.2.17) to (8.2.20), together with Gauss' and Stokes' theorems, to obtain the corresponding integral equations for a material medium, $$ \begin{aligned} &\oint_{s} \mathbf{D} \cdot d \mathbf{S}=q_{t r e t} \\ &\oint_{L} \mathbf{E} \cdot d \mathrm{l}=-\frac{d \Phi_{m}}{d t} \\ &\oint_{S} \mathbf{B} \cdot d \mathbf{S}=0 \\ &\oint_{L} \mathbf{H} \cdot d \mathbf{l}=I_{\text {froe }}+\frac{d \Phi_{\bullet}}{d t} \end{aligned} $$ where \(\Phi_{m}=\int \mathrm{B} \cdot d \mathrm{~S}\) and \(\Phi_{*}=\int \mathrm{D} \cdot d \mathrm{~S}\) are the magnetic and electric fluxes linking the closed line \(L\). These equations are generalizations of \((8.2 .11)\) to \((8.2 .14)\).

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free