(a) From \((8.7 .10)\) and \((8.7 .13)\), show that the guided ave impedance \(\left(E_{x}{ }^{2}+E_{y}{ }^{2}\right)^{1 / 2} /\) \(\left(H_{x}{ }^{2}+H_{z}{ }^{2}\right)^{1 / 2}\) is \(Z_{\mathrm{TE}}=\frac{Z_{0}}{\left[1-\left(\lambda_{0} / \lambda_{e}\right)^{2}\right]^{1 / 2}} \quad\) TE modes \(Z_{\text {T? }}=Z_{0}\left[1-\left(\lambda_{0} / \lambda_{c}\right)^{2}\right]^{1 / 2} \quad\) TM modes, where \(Z_{0}\) is the unbounded wave impedance \((8.3 .10)\) or, more generally, \((8.3 .12) .(b)\) For the TE o dominant mode in rectangular waveguide, show that the peak potential difference between opposite points in the cross section is $$ V_{0}=\left[\int_{0}^{b} E_{y}\left(x=\frac{1}{2} a\right) d y\right]_{p e s k}=b E_{0} $$ and that the peak axial current flowing in the top wall is $$ I_{0} \equiv\left[\frac{1}{\mu_{0}} \int_{0}^{a} B_{x}(y=b) d x\right]_{\text {pak }}=\frac{2 a E_{0}}{\pi Z_{\mathrm{TE}}} $$ Since the result of Prob. 8.7.10b can be written $$ \bar{P}=\frac{a b}{4} \frac{E_{0}{ }^{2}}{Z_{\mathrm{TB}}} $$ we can define three other (mode-dependent) waveguide impedances as follows: $$ \begin{aligned} &Z_{V, I}=\frac{V_{0}}{I_{0}}=\frac{\pi}{2}\left(\frac{b}{a} Z_{\mathrm{TE}}\right) \\ &Z_{P, V}=\frac{V_{0}{ }^{2}}{2 P}=2\left(\frac{b}{a} Z_{\mathrm{TE}}\right) \\\ &Z_{P, I}=\frac{2 \bar{P}}{I_{0}{ }^{2}}=\frac{\pi^{2}}{8}\left(\frac{b}{a} Z_{\mathrm{TE}}\right) \end{aligned} $$ which differ by small numerical factors. Only systems supporting a TEM mode (e.g., Sec. 8.1), have a unique impedance.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The guided wave impedance in a waveguide depends on its operating mode. For TE and TM modes, we use equations (8.7 .10) and (8.7 .13) to derive the magnitudes ratios of electric field to magnetic field, which provide expressions for guided wave impedance in these modes. In the TE dominant mode of a rectangular waveguide, the peak potential difference (across width) can be found by integrating the electric field (E_y) over the width (b) of the waveguide. The peak axial current flowing in the top wall can be found by integrating the magnetic field (B_x) over the width (a) and then dividing by the permeability (μ_0). Three mode-dependent waveguide impedances can be defined and their relationships to each other and to Z_TE can be derived: 1. Z_V, I = V_0/I_0, relating the peak potential difference to the peak axial current. 2. Z_P, V = V_0^2/(2P), relating the square of the peak potential difference to the power. 3. Z_P, I = 2 * P/I_0^2, relating the power to the square of the peak axial current. These impedances differ only by small numerical factors, emphasizing that only systems supporting a TEM mode have a unique impedance.

Step by step solution

01

To derive the guided wave impedance, we first look for the relations between electric field (\(E_x, E_y\)) and magnetic field (\(H_x, H_z\)) using equations \((8.7 .10)\) and \((8.7 .13)\). By calculating the magnitude ratios of electric field to magnetic field, we can obtain the expressions for guided wave impedance for TE and TM modes. #Step 2: Find the peak potential difference across the cross-section of the rectangular waveguide for TE dominant mode#

For the TE dominant mode, we can find the peak potential difference across the cross-section by integrating the electric field \(E_y\) over the width of the rectangular waveguide (width \(b\)) with \(x=\frac{1}{2}a\). This gives us the expression for \(V_0\) as shown in the exercise. #Step 3: Find the peak axial current flowing in the top wall of the rectangular waveguide for the TE dominant mode#
02

We can find the peak axial current flowing in the top wall by integrating the magnetic field \(B_x\) over the width of the rectangular waveguide (width \(a\)) with \(y=b\) and then dividing it by the permeability \(\mu_0\). This will result in the expression for \(I_0\) shown in the exercise. #Step 4: Define the three mode-dependent waveguide impedances and their relationships#

The three mode-dependent waveguide impedances can be defined as follows: \(Z_{V, I} = \frac{V_0}{I_0}\), \(Z_{P, V} = \frac{V_0^{2}}{2P}\), and \(Z_{P, I} = \frac{2 \bar{P}}{I_0^{2}}\). We can then derive their relationships to each other and to \(Z_{\mathrm{TE}}\), which are presented in the exercise. Notice that they differ only by small numerical factors. This indicates that only systems supporting a TEM mode have a unique impedance.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Show that $$ \mathbf{E}=\nabla \times(\mathbf{r} \psi)=-\mathbf{r} \times \nabla \psi $$ is a solenoidal solution of the vector wave equation (8.7.1) such that \(\mathbf{E}\) is everywhere tangential to a spherical boundary. Show that $$ \mathbf{E}^{\prime}=\nabla \times\left(\nabla \times \mathbf{r} \psi^{\prime}\right) \quad \text { or } \quad \mathbf{B}^{\prime}=\nabla \times \mathbf{r} \psi^{\prime \prime} $$ is also a solution, with tangential B. Show that in either case the \(\mathbf{E}\) and \(\mathbf{B}\) fields are orthogonal. (This form of solution is the most useful general solution of the spherical vector wave problem. \(\dagger\) )

Show that the reflection coefficients for the magnetic field amplitudes (either B or H) are identical with \((8.6 .28)\) and \((8.6 .36)\), while the transmission coefficients differ from (8.6.29) and \((8.6 .37)\) by the ratio of the wave impedances of the two media, \((8.5 .18)\) or \((8.5 .19)\). Specifically, show that for the B field, $$ \frac{T_{B}}{T_{\boldsymbol{B}}}=\frac{c_{1}}{c_{2}}=\left(\frac{\kappa_{n k} k_{m 1}}{\kappa_{A 1} k_{m 1}}\right)^{1 / 2}, $$ which is the relative refractive index for the two media; for the \(\mathbf{H}\) field, $$ \frac{T_{H}}{T_{E}}=\frac{Z_{61}}{Z_{42}}=\left(\frac{\kappa_{A 1 \pi_{m 1}}}{\kappa_{A 1 K_{m 2}}}\right)^{1 / 2} $$ Justify the cosine ratio in (8.6.39).

For normal incidence and nonmagnetic materials show that the power coefficients \((8.6 .38)\) and \((8.6 .39)\) reduce to $$ \begin{aligned} &R_{p}=\left(\frac{n-1}{n+1}\right)^{x} \\ &T_{p}=\frac{4 n}{(n+1)^{2}} \end{aligned} $$ where \(n=c_{1} / c_{2}=Z_{01} / Z_{02}\) is the relative refractive index. Account for the difference in sign between the amplitude reflection coefficients \((8.6 .28)\) and \((8.6 .36)\) at normal incidence (see footnote, page 102). Compare with equations (1.9.6), (4.2.15), and (5.6.13).

Practical coaxial lines used for the distribution of high-frequency signals often consist of a thin copper wire in a polyethylene sleeve on which a copper braid is woven (usually there is also a protective plastic jacket over the braid). Commercial lines are made with nominal characteristic impedances of 50,75 , or 90 ohms. A common 50 -ohm variety has a center conductor of diameter 0035 in. The dielectric constant of polyethylene is \(2.3\) What is the nominal (inside) diameter of the copper braid? What are the capacitance and inductance per foot? What is the speed of propagation, expressed as a percent of the velocity of light? Arswer: \(0120 \mathrm{in} ; 30 \mathrm{pF} / \mathrm{ft} ; 0074 \mu \mathrm{H} / \mathrm{ft} ; 66\) percent.

Consider two unbounded plane waves whose vector wave numbers \(k_{1}\) and \(\kappa_{2}\left(\left.\right|_{1,2} \mid=\right.\) \(\omega / c)\) define a plane and whose electric fields are polarized normal to the plane. (a) Show that the superposition of these two plane waves is a wave traveling in the direction bisecting the angle \(\alpha\) between \({ }_{1}{ }_{1}\) and \({ }_{k}\) and that the \(\mathbf{E}\) field vanishes on a set of nodal planes spaced \(a=\) \(\lambda_{0} / 2 \sin \frac{1}{2} \alpha\) apart. \((b)\) Show that plane conducting walls can be placed at two adjacent nodal planes without violating the electromagnetic boundary conditions and likewise that a second pair of conducting walls of arbitrary separation \(b\) can be introduced to construct a rectangular waveguide of cross section \(a\) by \(b\), propagating the \(T E_{10}\) mode. Thus establish that the TE \(_{10}\) mode (more generally, the TE \(_{10}\) modes) may be interpreted as the superposition of two plane waves making the angle \(\frac{1}{2} \alpha\) with the waveguide axis and undergoing multiple reflections from the sidewalls. Note: The situation is directly analogous to that discussed in Sec. 2.4. Higherorder TE modes \((m>0)\) and TM modes may be described similarly as a superposition of four plane waves.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free