When matter is present, the phenomenon of polarization (electrical displacement of charge in a molecule or alignment of polar molecules) can produce unneutralized (bound) charge that properly contributes to \(\rho\) in \((8.2 .1)\). Similarly the magnetization of magnetic materials, as well as time-varying polarization, can produce efiective currents that contribute to \(J\) in \((8.24)\). These dependent source charges and currents, as opposed to the independent or "causal" free charges and currents, can be taken into account implicitly by introducing two new fields, the dectric displacement \(\mathbf{D}\) and the magnetic intensity \(\mathbf{H} .+\) For linear isotropic media, $$ \begin{aligned} &\mathbf{D}=\kappa_{\varepsilon} \epsilon_{0} \mathbf{E} \\ &\mathbf{H}=\frac{\mathbf{B}}{\kappa_{m} \mu_{0}} \end{aligned} $$ where \(\kappa_{0}\) is the relative permittivity (or dielectric constant) and \(\kappa_{m}\) is the rclative permeability of the medium. In this more general situation, Maxwell's equations are $$ \begin{aligned} &\nabla \cdot \mathbf{D}=\rho_{\text {ree }} \\ &\nabla \times \mathbf{E}=-\frac{\partial \mathbf{B}}{\partial t} \\ &\nabla \cdot \mathbf{B}=0 \\ &\nabla \times \mathbf{H}=\mathbf{J}_{\text {frea }}+\frac{\partial \mathbf{D}}{\partial l} \end{aligned} $$ Show that in a homogeneous material medium without free charges or currents, the fields obey the simple wave equation with a velocity of propagation $$ c^{\prime}=\frac{1}{\left(x_{q} \operatorname{tos}_{m} \mu_{0}\right)^{1 / 2}}=\frac{c}{\left(\alpha_{q} K_{m}\right)^{1 / 2}} $$ and that consequently the refractive index of the medium is given by $$ n=\left(x_{q} K_{m}\right)^{1 / 2} $$

Short Answer

Expert verified
Question: Write the wave equations for the given fields in a material medium, and find the propagation velocity and refractive index of the medium. Answer: The wave equations for the given fields are as follows: 1. \(-\nabla \times (\nabla \times \mathbf{E}) = \frac{\partial^2 \mathbf{B}}{\partial t^2}\) 2. \(\nabla^2 \left(\frac{\mathbf{B}}{\kappa_{m} \mu_{0}}\right) = \frac{\partial^2 (\kappa_{\varepsilon} \epsilon_{0} \mathbf{E})}{\partial t^2}\) The propagation velocity \(c'\) can be calculated using the formula: \(c^{\prime}=\frac{1}{\sqrt{\kappa_{\varepsilon} \kappa_{m} \epsilon_{0} \mu_{0}}}=\frac{c}{\sqrt{\kappa_{\varepsilon} \kappa_{m}}}\) The refractive index \(n\) can be calculated using the formula: \(n=\sqrt{\kappa_{\varepsilon} \kappa_{m}}\)

Step by step solution

01

General form of the wave equation

The general form of the wave equation is given by: $$ \nabla^2 \mathbf{F} - \frac{1}{v^2}\frac{\partial^2 \mathbf{F}}{\partial t^2} = 0 $$ where \(\mathbf{F}\) represents a generic field, and \(v\) is the propagation velocity.
02

Substitute the expressions of \(\mathbf{D}\) and \(\mathbf{H}\) in Maxwell's equations

Let's substitute the expression for \(\mathbf{D}\) and \(\mathbf{H}\) in the Maxwell's equations: $$ \begin{aligned} &\nabla \cdot (\kappa_{\varepsilon} \epsilon_{0} \mathbf{E})=\rho_{\text {fee }} \\ &\nabla \times \mathbf{E}=-\frac{\partial \mathbf{B}}{\partial t} \\ &\nabla \cdot \mathbf{B}=0 \\ &\nabla \times \left(\frac{\mathbf{B}}{\kappa_{m} \mu_{0}}\right)=\mathbf{J}_{\text {free }}+\frac{\partial (\kappa_{\varepsilon} \epsilon_{0} \mathbf{E})}{\partial t} \end{aligned} $$
03

Consider no free charges and currents

As there are no free charges or currents in the material medium, we set \(ρ_{\text{free}} = 0\) and \(J_{\text {free}} = 0\): $$ \begin{aligned} &\nabla \cdot (\kappa_{\varepsilon} \epsilon_{0} \mathbf{E})=0 \\ &\nabla \times \mathbf{E}=-\frac{\partial \mathbf{B}}{\partial t} \\ &\nabla \cdot \mathbf{B}=0 \\ &\nabla \times \left(\frac{\mathbf{B}}{\kappa_{m} \mu_{0}}\right)=\frac{\partial (\kappa_{\varepsilon} \epsilon_{0} \mathbf{E})}{\partial t} \end{aligned} $$
04

Use the curl of the curl identity

We will use the following identity for the curl of the curl: $$ \nabla \times (\nabla \times \mathbf{F}) = \nabla(\nabla \cdot \mathbf{F}) - \nabla^2 \mathbf{F} $$ Applying this identity to the second and fourth equation: $$ \begin{aligned} &-\nabla \times (\nabla \times \mathbf{E}) = \frac{\partial^2 \mathbf{B}}{\partial t^2} \\ &\nabla(\nabla \cdot \left(\frac{\mathbf{B}}{\kappa_{m} \mu_{0}}\right)) - \nabla^2 \left(\frac{\mathbf{B}}{\kappa_{m} \mu_{0}}\right) = \frac{\partial^2 (\kappa_{\varepsilon} \epsilon_{0} \mathbf{E})}{\partial t^2} \end{aligned} $$
05

Show that the resulting equations satisfy the wave equation

Now, we have the following equations: $$ \begin{aligned} &-\nabla \times (\nabla \times \mathbf{E}) = \frac{\partial^2 \mathbf{B}}{\partial t^2} \\ &\nabla^2 \left(\frac{\mathbf{B}}{\kappa_{m} \mu_{0}}\right) = \frac{\partial^2 (\kappa_{\varepsilon} \epsilon_{0} \mathbf{E})}{\partial t^2} \end{aligned} $$ These equations have the form of the wave equation, as shown in Step 1.
06

Find the propagation velocity and refractive index

From the wave equation, we can find the propagation velocity \(c'\) and the refractive index \(n\) of the medium: $$ c^{\prime}=\frac{1}{\sqrt{\kappa_{\varepsilon} \kappa_{m} \epsilon_{0} \mu_{0}}}=\frac{c}{\sqrt{\kappa_{\varepsilon} \kappa_{m}}} $$ and $$ n=\sqrt{\kappa_{\varepsilon} \kappa_{m}} $$

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

(a) From \((8.7 .10)\) and \((8.7 .13)\), show that the guided ave impedance \(\left(E_{x}{ }^{2}+E_{y}{ }^{2}\right)^{1 / 2} /\) \(\left(H_{x}{ }^{2}+H_{z}{ }^{2}\right)^{1 / 2}\) is \(Z_{\mathrm{TE}}=\frac{Z_{0}}{\left[1-\left(\lambda_{0} / \lambda_{e}\right)^{2}\right]^{1 / 2}} \quad\) TE modes \(Z_{\text {T? }}=Z_{0}\left[1-\left(\lambda_{0} / \lambda_{c}\right)^{2}\right]^{1 / 2} \quad\) TM modes, where \(Z_{0}\) is the unbounded wave impedance \((8.3 .10)\) or, more generally, \((8.3 .12) .(b)\) For the TE o dominant mode in rectangular waveguide, show that the peak potential difference between opposite points in the cross section is $$ V_{0}=\left[\int_{0}^{b} E_{y}\left(x=\frac{1}{2} a\right) d y\right]_{p e s k}=b E_{0} $$ and that the peak axial current flowing in the top wall is $$ I_{0} \equiv\left[\frac{1}{\mu_{0}} \int_{0}^{a} B_{x}(y=b) d x\right]_{\text {pak }}=\frac{2 a E_{0}}{\pi Z_{\mathrm{TE}}} $$ Since the result of Prob. 8.7.10b can be written $$ \bar{P}=\frac{a b}{4} \frac{E_{0}{ }^{2}}{Z_{\mathrm{TB}}} $$ we can define three other (mode-dependent) waveguide impedances as follows: $$ \begin{aligned} &Z_{V, I}=\frac{V_{0}}{I_{0}}=\frac{\pi}{2}\left(\frac{b}{a} Z_{\mathrm{TE}}\right) \\ &Z_{P, V}=\frac{V_{0}{ }^{2}}{2 P}=2\left(\frac{b}{a} Z_{\mathrm{TE}}\right) \\\ &Z_{P, I}=\frac{2 \bar{P}}{I_{0}{ }^{2}}=\frac{\pi^{2}}{8}\left(\frac{b}{a} Z_{\mathrm{TE}}\right) \end{aligned} $$ which differ by small numerical factors. Only systems supporting a TEM mode (e.g., Sec. 8.1), have a unique impedance.

Adapt the discussion at the end of Sec. 57 to show that the number of rectangular-waveguide modes whose cutoff frequencies are less than a given frequency \(\omega_{\max } x\) approximately, $$ N=\frac{\omega_{\max }^{2}}{2 \pi c^{2}} a b, $$ where \(N\) is assumed to be very large, and hence that the density of modes per unit frequency interval \(d N / d \omega\) increases linearly with frequency. Hint: Count both TE and TM modes.

The text following (8.2.10) refers to low-frequency (or dc) laboratory measurements of \(\epsilon_{0}\) and \(\mu_{0}\). How could you determine these constants? What logical chain of definitions and calibrations would be needed?

Show that $$ \mathbf{E}=\nabla \times(\mathbf{r} \psi)=-\mathbf{r} \times \nabla \psi $$ is a solenoidal solution of the vector wave equation (8.7.1) such that \(\mathbf{E}\) is everywhere tangential to a spherical boundary. Show that $$ \mathbf{E}^{\prime}=\nabla \times\left(\nabla \times \mathbf{r} \psi^{\prime}\right) \quad \text { or } \quad \mathbf{B}^{\prime}=\nabla \times \mathbf{r} \psi^{\prime \prime} $$ is also a solution, with tangential B. Show that in either case the \(\mathbf{E}\) and \(\mathbf{B}\) fields are orthogonal. (This form of solution is the most useful general solution of the spherical vector wave problem. \(\dagger\) )

Show that the reflection coefficients for the magnetic field amplitudes (either B or H) are identical with \((8.6 .28)\) and \((8.6 .36)\), while the transmission coefficients differ from (8.6.29) and \((8.6 .37)\) by the ratio of the wave impedances of the two media, \((8.5 .18)\) or \((8.5 .19)\). Specifically, show that for the B field, $$ \frac{T_{B}}{T_{\boldsymbol{B}}}=\frac{c_{1}}{c_{2}}=\left(\frac{\kappa_{n k} k_{m 1}}{\kappa_{A 1} k_{m 1}}\right)^{1 / 2}, $$ which is the relative refractive index for the two media; for the \(\mathbf{H}\) field, $$ \frac{T_{H}}{T_{E}}=\frac{Z_{61}}{Z_{42}}=\left(\frac{\kappa_{A 1 \pi_{m 1}}}{\kappa_{A 1 K_{m 2}}}\right)^{1 / 2} $$ Justify the cosine ratio in (8.6.39).

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free