Show that $$ \mathbf{E}=\nabla \times(\mathbf{r} \psi)=-\mathbf{r} \times \nabla \psi $$ is a solenoidal solution of the vector wave equation (8.7.1) such that \(\mathbf{E}\) is everywhere tangential to a spherical boundary. Show that $$ \mathbf{E}^{\prime}=\nabla \times\left(\nabla \times \mathbf{r} \psi^{\prime}\right) \quad \text { or } \quad \mathbf{B}^{\prime}=\nabla \times \mathbf{r} \psi^{\prime \prime} $$ is also a solution, with tangential B. Show that in either case the \(\mathbf{E}\) and \(\mathbf{B}\) fields are orthogonal. (This form of solution is the most useful general solution of the spherical vector wave problem. \(\dagger\) )

Short Answer

Expert verified
Question: Show that the given electric field \(\mathbf{E}=\nabla\times(\mathbf{r}\psi)\) is a solenoidal solution of the vector wave equation. Also, show that \(\mathbf{E'}=\nabla\times(\nabla\times\mathbf{r}\psi')\) and \(\mathbf{B'}=\nabla\times\mathbf{r}\psi''\) are solenoidal solutions with tangential \(\mathbf{B'}\). Answer: We showed that the given electric field \(\mathbf{E}\) is a solenoidal solution of the vector wave equation by applying the vector calculus identities like Curl-Curl identity and linearity of the curl operator. We also established that the given \(\mathbf{E'}\) and \(\mathbf{B'}\) are solenoidal solutions using the divergence-curl identity. Finally, we demonstrated that the \(\mathbf{B}\) field is tangential by showing that the dot product of the \(\mathbf{E}\) field with the \(\mathbf{B'}\) field is zero, proving that they are orthogonal.

Step by step solution

01

Analyzing E-field as a solution of the vector wave equation

Given that the electric field \(\mathbf{E} = \nabla \times (\mathbf{r}\psi)\), we need to show that this satisfies the vector wave equation: $$ \nabla^2 \mathbf{E} - \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2 \mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2} = 0 $$ Where \(\nabla^2\) is the Laplacian operator and \(c\) is the speed of light. First, let's find the curl of \(\mathbf{E}\): $$ \nabla\times\mathbf{E} = \nabla\times\left(\nabla\times (\mathbf{r}\psi)\right) $$ Now, using the Curl-Curl identity, we have: $$ \nabla\times\mathbf{E} = \nabla\left(\nabla\cdot(\mathbf{r}\psi)\right) - \nabla^2(\mathbf{r}\psi) $$ Next, let's evaluate the time derivative in the wave equation: $$ \frac{\partial \mathbf{E}}{\partial t} = \frac{\partial}{\partial t}(\nabla\times(\mathbf{r}\psi)) $$ Since \(\mathbf{r}\) is a position vector and does not depend on time: $$ \frac{\partial \mathbf{E}}{\partial t} = \nabla\times(\mathbf{r}\frac{\partial \psi}{\partial t}) $$ Taking the second-order time derivative: $$ \frac{\partial^2 \mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2} = \nabla\times(\mathbf{r}\frac{\partial^2 \psi}{\partial t^2}) $$ Now substitute the expressions for the Laplacian of \(\mathbf{E}\) and second-order time derivative of \(\mathbf{E}\) in the vector wave equation.
02

Solving the vector wave equation

Substituting the expressions found in Step 1 into the vector wave equation: $$ \nabla^2(\mathbf{r}\psi) - \frac{1}{c^2}(\nabla\times(\mathbf{r}\frac{\partial^2 \psi}{\partial t^2})) = 0 $$ Now, apply the curl on both sides: $$ \Rightarrow \nabla\times\Big(\nabla^2(\mathbf{r}\psi) - \frac{1}{c^2}(\nabla\times(\mathbf{r}\frac{\partial^2 \psi}{\partial t^2}))\Big) = \mathbf{0} $$ By the linearity of the curl operator, we have: $$ \Rightarrow \nabla\times\nabla^2(\mathbf{r}\psi) - \frac{1}{c^2}\nabla\times(\nabla\times(\mathbf{r}\frac{\partial^2 \psi}{\partial t^2})) = \mathbf{0} $$ Now, utilize the Curl-Curl identity in reverse and rearrange the terms: $$ \Rightarrow \nabla\times\left(\nabla\left(\nabla\cdot(\mathbf{r}\psi)\right) - \nabla^2(\mathbf{r}\psi)\right) = \frac{1}{c^2}\nabla\times(\nabla\times(\mathbf{r}\frac{\partial^2 \psi}{\partial t^2})) $$ Looking at the equivalence: $$ \mathbf{E} = \nabla\times(\mathbf{r}\psi) $$ We can say that the given \(\mathbf{E}\) field satisfies the vector wave equation, and thus is a solenoidal solution.
03

Analyzing \(\mathbf{E'}\) and \(\mathbf{B'}\) fields

The expressions for \(\mathbf{E'}\) and \(\mathbf{B'}\) are given as: $$ \mathbf{E'}=\nabla \times\left(\nabla \times \mathbf{r} \psi^{\prime}\right) \quad \text { and } \quad \mathbf{B'}=\nabla \times \mathbf{r} \psi^{\prime \prime} $$ We need to show that these are solenoidal solutions with tangential \(\mathbf{B}\) field. We will use the divergence-curl identity to show that both these fields are solenoidal: $$ \nabla\cdot\mathbf{E'} = \nabla\cdot\left(\nabla \times\left(\nabla \times \mathbf{r} \psi^{\prime}\right)\right) = 0 $$ $$ \nabla\cdot\mathbf{B'} = \nabla\cdot\left(\nabla \times \mathbf{r} \psi^{\prime \prime}\right) = 0 $$ Therefore, both \(\mathbf{E'}\) and \(\mathbf{B'}\) are solenoidal. Next, we show that the \(\mathbf{B}\) field is tangential by analyzing its dot product with the \(\mathbf{E}\) field: $$ \mathbf{E}\cdot\mathbf{B'} = (\nabla\times(\mathbf{r}\psi))\cdot(\nabla\times(\mathbf{r}\psi^{\prime\prime})) $$ Use vector triple product identity: \(\mathbf{A}\cdot(\mathbf{B}\times\mathbf{C}) = \mathbf{B}\cdot(\mathbf{C}\times\mathbf{A})\). Therefore, $$ \mathbf{E}\cdot\mathbf{B'} = (\mathbf{r}\psi^{\prime\prime})\cdot(\nabla\times(\mathbf{r}\psi)) = \mathbf{r}\cdot(\nabla\times(\mathbf{r}\psi))\psi^{\prime\prime} = 0 $$ Since the dot product is zero, the \(\mathbf{E}\) and \(\mathbf{B}\) fields are orthogonal. Thus, the given \(\mathbf{E}\) and \(\mathbf{B'}\) are solenoidal solutions with orthogonal fields.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The treatment in the text tacitly assumes that the interior of the waveguide has the electromagnetic properties of vacuum. Show that if the waveguide is filled with a material of relative permittivity \(\pi_{e}\) and permeability \(\pi_{m}\), all equations remain valid if \(c\) is replaced by \(c^{\prime}\) of \((8.2 .21)\) and \(\lambda_{9}\) in \((8.7 .20)\) is replaced by \(\lambda^{\prime}=2 \pi c^{\prime} / \omega\).

For normal incidence and nonmagnetic materials show that the power coefficients \((8.6 .38)\) and \((8.6 .39)\) reduce to $$ \begin{aligned} &R_{p}=\left(\frac{n-1}{n+1}\right)^{x} \\ &T_{p}=\frac{4 n}{(n+1)^{2}} \end{aligned} $$ where \(n=c_{1} / c_{2}=Z_{01} / Z_{02}\) is the relative refractive index. Account for the difference in sign between the amplitude reflection coefficients \((8.6 .28)\) and \((8.6 .36)\) at normal incidence (see footnote, page 102). Compare with equations (1.9.6), (4.2.15), and (5.6.13).

It is often convenient to discuss electromagnetic problems in terms of potentials rather than fields. For instance, elementary treatments show that the electrostatic field \(\mathbf{E}(\mathbf{r})\) is conservative and can be derived from a scalar potential function \(\phi(\mathbf{r})\), which is related to \(\mathbf{E}\) by $$ \begin{aligned} &\phi=-\int_{r_{0}}^{r} \mathbf{E} \cdot d \mathbf{l} \\ &\mathbf{E}=-\nabla \phi \end{aligned} $$ Mathematically, the conservative nature of the static field \(\mathbf{E}\) is expressed by the vanishing of its curl. Since the curl of any gradient is identically zero, use of the scalar potential automatically satisfies the static limit of the Maxwell equation (8.2.2); the other constraint on \(\phi\) is Gauss' law (8.2.1). Which hecomes Poisson's equation $$ \nabla^{2} \phi=-\frac{\rho}{\epsilon_{0}} $$ (a) Show that \((8.2 .3)\) is satisfied automatically if we introduce the magnetic vector potential \(\mathbf{A}\), related to the magnetic field by $$ B=\nabla \times A . $$ (b) Show that in the general (nonstatic) case, the electric field is given in terms of the scalar and vector potentials by $$ \mathbf{E}=-\nabla \phi-\frac{\partial \mathbf{A}}{\partial t} $$ (c) Complete the prescription of \(\mathbf{A}\) by defining its divergence by the Lorents condition $$ \boldsymbol{\nabla} \cdot \mathbf{A}=-\frac{1}{c^{2}} \frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t} $$ and show that the two potentials obey the symmetrical inhomogeneous wave equations $$ \begin{aligned} &\nabla^{2} \phi-\frac{1}{c^{2}} \frac{\partial^{2} \phi}{\partial t^{2}}=-\frac{\rho}{\epsilon_{0}} \\ &\nabla^{2} \mathbf{A}-\frac{1}{c^{2}} \frac{\partial^{2} \mathbf{A}}{\partial t^{2}}=-\mu_{0} \mathbf{J} . \end{aligned} $$ These equations connect the potentials associated with radiation fields with their sources \(\rho\) and \(\mathbf{J}\).

When matter is present, the phenomenon of polarization (electrical displacement of charge in a molecule or alignment of polar molecules) can produce unneutralized (bound) charge that properly contributes to \(\rho\) in \((8.2 .1)\). Similarly the magnetization of magnetic materials, as well as time-varying polarization, can produce efiective currents that contribute to \(J\) in \((8.24)\). These dependent source charges and currents, as opposed to the independent or "causal" free charges and currents, can be taken into account implicitly by introducing two new fields, the dectric displacement \(\mathbf{D}\) and the magnetic intensity \(\mathbf{H} .+\) For linear isotropic media, $$ \begin{aligned} &\mathbf{D}=\kappa_{\varepsilon} \epsilon_{0} \mathbf{E} \\ &\mathbf{H}=\frac{\mathbf{B}}{\kappa_{m} \mu_{0}} \end{aligned} $$ where \(\kappa_{0}\) is the relative permittivity (or dielectric constant) and \(\kappa_{m}\) is the rclative permeability of the medium. In this more general situation, Maxwell's equations are $$ \begin{aligned} &\nabla \cdot \mathbf{D}=\rho_{\text {ree }} \\ &\nabla \times \mathbf{E}=-\frac{\partial \mathbf{B}}{\partial t} \\ &\nabla \cdot \mathbf{B}=0 \\ &\nabla \times \mathbf{H}=\mathbf{J}_{\text {frea }}+\frac{\partial \mathbf{D}}{\partial l} \end{aligned} $$ Show that in a homogeneous material medium without free charges or currents, the fields obey the simple wave equation with a velocity of propagation $$ c^{\prime}=\frac{1}{\left(x_{q} \operatorname{tos}_{m} \mu_{0}\right)^{1 / 2}}=\frac{c}{\left(\alpha_{q} K_{m}\right)^{1 / 2}} $$ and that consequently the refractive index of the medium is given by $$ n=\left(x_{q} K_{m}\right)^{1 / 2} $$

The text following (8.2.10) refers to low-frequency (or dc) laboratory measurements of \(\epsilon_{0}\) and \(\mu_{0}\). How could you determine these constants? What logical chain of definitions and calibrations would be needed?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free