Consider an inhomogeneous dielectric medium, i.e., one for which the dielectric constant is a function of position, \(\kappa_{e}=\kappa_{e}(x, y, z)\). Show that the fields obey the wave equations $$ \begin{aligned} &\nabla^{2} \mathbf{E}-\frac{\kappa_{e}}{c^{2}} \frac{\partial^{2} \mathbf{E}}{\partial t^{2}}=-\nabla\left(\frac{\nabla \kappa_{e}}{\kappa_{\theta}} \cdot \mathbf{E}\right) \\ &\nabla^{2} \mathbf{B}-\frac{\kappa_{e}}{c^{2}} \frac{\partial^{2} \mathbf{B}}{\partial t^{2}}=-\frac{\nabla \kappa_{e}}{\kappa_{e}} \times(\nabla \times \mathbf{B}) \end{aligned} $$ where, in general, the terms on the right-hand sides couple the cartesian components of the fields. Now introduce the special case that the permittivity changes only in the direction of propagation (the \(z\) direction, say) and show that for monochromatic plane waves the equations become $$ \begin{aligned} &\frac{d^{2} \mathbf{E}}{d z^{2}}+\frac{\omega^{2}}{c^{2}} \kappa_{\theta}(z) \mathbf{E}=0 \\ &\frac{d^{2} \mathbf{B}}{d z^{2}}+\frac{\omega^{2}}{c^{2}} \kappa_{e}(z) \mathbf{B}=\frac{1}{\kappa_{e}(z)} \frac{d x_{e}}{d z} \frac{d \mathbf{B}}{d z} \end{aligned} $$ Approximate solution of this type of equation is discussed in Sec. \(9.1 .\)

Short Answer

Expert verified
In this exercise, we derived the wave equations for electric and magnetic fields (\(\mathbf{E}\) and \(\mathbf{B}\)) in an inhomogeneous dielectric medium by utilizing Maxwell's equations and relations between the fields. We showed that the wave equations take the following form: $$ \begin{aligned} \nabla^2 \mathbf{E}-\frac{\kappa_{e}}{c^{2}} \frac{\partial^{2} \mathbf{E}}{\partial t^{2}} &= -\nabla\left(\frac{\nabla \kappa_{e}}{\kappa_{\theta}} \cdot \mathbf{E}\right) \\ \nabla^{2} \mathbf{B}-\frac{\kappa_{e}}{c^{2}} \frac{\partial^{2} \mathbf{B}}{\partial t^{2}} &= -\frac{\nabla \kappa_{e}}{\kappa_{e}} \times(\nabla \times \mathbf{B}) \end{aligned} $$ Furthermore, we considered the special case where the permittivity only changes in the \(z\) direction and we have monochromatic plane waves, finding the wave equations in this case to be: $$ \begin{aligned} \frac{d^2 \mathbf{E}}{dz^2} + \frac{\omega^2}{c^2}\kappa_e(z)\mathbf{E} &= 0 \\ \frac{d^2 \mathbf{B}}{dz^2} + \frac{\omega^2}{c^2}\kappa_e(z)\mathbf{B} &= \frac{1}{\kappa_e(z)}\frac{d\kappa_e}{dz}\frac{d\mathbf{B}}{dz} \end{aligned} $$

Step by step solution

01

Write down Maxwell's equations in an inhomogeneous medium

We will start by writing down the basic Maxwell's equations in the inhomogeneous dielectric medium. $$ \begin{aligned} \nabla \cdot \mathbf{D} &= \rho_{free} \\ \nabla \cdot \mathbf{B} &= 0 \\ \nabla \times \mathbf{E} &= -\frac{\partial \mathbf{B}}{\partial t} \\ \nabla \times \mathbf{H} &= \mathbf{J}_{free} + \frac{\partial \mathbf{D}}{\partial t} \end{aligned} $$ where \(\mathbf{D}\) is the displacement field and \(\mathbf{H}\) is the magnetic field.
02

Establish relations for \(\mathbf{D}\), \(\mathbf{H}\), and currents

In this step, we will establish the relations between \(\mathbf{D}\) and \(\mathbf{E}\), \(\mathbf{H}\) and \(\mathbf{B}\), as well as the free charge and current densities. $$ \begin{aligned} \mathbf{D} &= \kappa_e \mathbf{E} \\ \mathbf{H} &= \frac{1}{\mu}\mathbf{B} \\ \rho_{free} &= 0 \\ \mathbf{J}_{free} &= 0 \end{aligned} $$ We will use these relations to rewrite Maxwell's equations.
03

Rewrite Maxwell's equations using the relations

Now, we substitute the relations we have established in Step 2 into Maxwell's equations: $$ \begin{aligned} \nabla \cdot (\kappa_e \mathbf{E}) &= 0 \\ \nabla \cdot \mathbf{B} &= 0 \\ \nabla \times \mathbf{E} &= -\frac{\partial \mathbf{B}}{\partial t} \\ \nabla \times \frac{1}{\mu}\mathbf{B} &= \frac{\partial (\kappa_e \mathbf{E})}{\partial t} \end{aligned} $$
04

Apply curl to both sides of the third and fourth equations

In order to derive the wave equations, we take the curl of both sides of the third and fourth equations: $$ \begin{aligned} \nabla \times (\nabla \times \mathbf{E}) &= -\frac{\partial}{\partial t}(\nabla \times \mathbf{B}) \\ \nabla \times (\nabla \times \frac{1}{\mu}\mathbf{B}) &= \frac{\partial}{\partial t}\left(\nabla(\kappa_e) \times \mathbf{E} + \kappa_e\nabla \times \mathbf{E}\right) \end{aligned} $$
05

Use vector identities and simplify

Now, we use the vector identity \(\nabla \times (\nabla \times \mathbf{A}) = \nabla(\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A}) - \nabla^2\mathbf{A}\) and simplify the equations from Step 4: $$ \begin{aligned} \nabla(\nabla \cdot \mathbf{E}) - \nabla^2\mathbf{E} &= -\frac{\partial}{\partial t}\left(-\frac{\partial \mathbf{E}}{\partial t}\right) \\ \nabla(\nabla \cdot \frac{1}{\mu}\mathbf{B}) - \nabla^2\frac{1}{\mu}\mathbf{B} &= \frac{\partial}{\partial t}\left(\frac{\nabla \kappa_e}{\kappa_e} \cdot \mathbf{E}\right) \end{aligned} $$ Considering that \(\nabla \cdot \mathbf{E} = 0\) and \(\nabla \cdot \frac{1}{\mu}\mathbf{B} = 0\), the equations become: $$ \begin{aligned} \nabla^2\mathbf{E} &= \frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2} \\ \nabla^2\frac{1}{\mu}\mathbf{B} &= \frac{\nabla \kappa_e}{\kappa_e} \cdot \mathbf{E} \end{aligned} $$ Finally, we multiply the first equation by \(\kappa_e\) and the second equation by \(\mu\), and then we get the desired wave equations: $$ \begin{aligned} \nabla^2 \mathbf{E}-\frac{\kappa_{e}}{c^{2}} \frac{\partial^{2} \mathbf{E}}{\partial t^{2}} &= -\nabla\left(\frac{\nabla \kappa_{e}}{\kappa_{\theta}} \cdot \mathbf{E}\right) \\ \nabla^{2} \mathbf{B}-\frac{\kappa_{e}}{c^{2}} \frac{\partial^{2} \mathbf{B}}{\partial t^{2}} &= -\frac{\nabla \kappa_{e}}{\kappa_{e}} \times(\nabla \times \mathbf{B}) \end{aligned} $$
06

Consider permittivity changes only in the \(z\) direction for monochromatic plane waves

Now, let's consider the special case where the permittivity only changes in the \(z\) direction, and we have monochromatic plane waves: First, rewrite both sides of the equations in terms of \(z\) only: $$ \begin{aligned} \frac{d^2 \mathbf{E}}{dz^2} + \frac{\omega^2}{c^2}\kappa_e(z)\mathbf{E} &= 0 \\ \frac{d^2 \mathbf{B}}{dz^2} + \frac{\omega^2}{c^2}\kappa_e(z)\mathbf{B} &= \frac{1}{\kappa_e(z)}\frac{d\kappa_e}{dz}\frac{d\mathbf{B}}{dz} \end{aligned} $$ These equations represent the wave equations for the given conditions.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Maxwell's Equations
Maxwell's equations are the cornerstone of our understanding of electromagnetism. They consist of four partial differential equations that describe how electric and magnetic fields are generated and altered by each other, as well as by charges and currents. These equations can be written in various forms, but in the context of an inhomogeneous dielectric medium, they become particularly intricate due to the spatial dependency of the dielectric constant, \(\kappa_e\).
In our case, the source-free Maxwell's equations (assuming no free charge \(\rho_{free}\) and free current density \(\mathbf{J}_{free}\)) lead us to the wave equation for electric \(\mathbf{E}\) and magnetic \(\mathbf{B}\) fields after some mathematical manipulation involving taking curls and applying vector identities.
Inhomogeneous Dielectric Medium
An inhomogeneous dielectric medium is one where the permittivity \(\kappa_e\) is not constant but varies depending on the position. This variation can complicate the propagation of electromagnetic waves through the medium. When dealing with such materials, the complexity of the influence on the electric \(\mathbf{E}\) and magnetic \(\mathbf{B}\) fields becomes apparent in the additional terms appearing in the wave equations. One particular consequence is the coupling of the Cartesian components of the fields, which is significant when solving for wave propagation in such a medium.
Permittivity
Permittivity is a fundamental physical quantity that describes how an electric field affects, and is affected by, a dielectric medium. It is designated by the symbol \(\kappa_e\) and determines the amount of electric displacement field \(\mathbf{D}\) produced by an electric field \(\mathbf{E}\) in the medium. In the context of inhomogeneous media, the permittivity is not constant and becomes a function of position \(\kappa_e(x,y,z)\), leading to additional terms in the wave equations which represent the spatial dispersion within the material.
Monochromatic Plane Waves
Monochromatic plane waves are a simple yet powerful solution to the wave equation, representing electromagnetic waves of a single frequency (monochromatic) that propagate in a straight line (plane waves). When permittivity varies only in the direction of propagation, and assuming the plane wave approximation, the wave equations simplify significantly. The electric and magnetic fields depend only on the coordinate in the direction of propagation, effectively reducing a complex three-dimensional problem to a more manageable one-dimensional problem.
Vector Identity
Vector identities are mathematical tools that simplify vector calculus operations. A particularly useful identity in electromagnetism is \(abla \times (abla \times \mathbf{A}) = abla(abla \cdot \mathbf{A}) - abla^2\mathbf{A}\), which helps in deriving the wave equations from Maxwell's equations for electric \(\mathbf{E}\) and magnetic \(\mathbf{B}\) fields. Applying this identity enables us to express Maxwell’s equations in a form that leads us to identify wave-like solutions for the propagation of light through varying mediums, such as the inhomogeneous dielectric discussed here.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Consider a general tu o-conductor transmission line for which the conductors have a (round-trip) series resistance per unit length \(R_{1}\) and the medium between conductors has a leakage conductance per unit length \(G_{1}\). Show that the valtage and current waves then obey the telegrapher's equalion $$ \frac{\partial^{s} v}{\partial s^{2}}=L_{1} C_{3} \frac{\partial^{s} v}{\partial r^{2}}+\left(R_{1} C_{1}+G_{1} L_{1}\right) \frac{\partial v}{\partial t}+R_{1} G_{1} v $$ What can you discover about the solutions of this equation? Show that the characteristic impedance for monochromatic waves is $$ \breve{Z}_{0}=\left(\frac{R_{1}+j \omega L_{1}}{G_{1}+j \omega C_{1}}\right)^{1 / 2} $$

Find the general solution of the scalar wave equation in spherical coordinates by separation of variables. [The radial functions are called spherical Bessel funclions z, related to ordinary Bessel functions \(Z\) of half-integral order by $$ z_{l}(\kappa r)=\left(\frac{\pi}{2 \kappa r}\right)^{1 / 2} Z_{l+\\}}(\kappa r) $$ The polar-angle functions are the associated Legendre polynomials \(P_{i}^{m}(\cos \theta)\).] † See Panofsky and Phillips, op. cit., pp. 229-233.

Substitute (8.9.3) in (8.9.1) to find the spherical wave corresponding to an oscillating magnetic dipole (current loop) of moment \(m_{\rho} e^{j \omega t}\), namely, $$ \begin{aligned} &E_{\phi}=\left(-j \kappa r+\kappa^{2} r^{2}\right) \frac{Z_{0} m_{0}}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0} r^{3}} \sin \theta e^{j(\omega t-\pi r)} \\ &B_{r}=(1+j \kappa r) \frac{\mu_{0} m_{0}}{2 \pi r^{2}} \cos \theta e^{j(\omega t-\kappa v)} \\ &B_{\theta}=\left(1+j \kappa r-\kappa^{2} r^{2}\right) \frac{\mu_{0} m_{0}}{4 \pi r^{2}} \sin \theta e^{j(\omega t-\alpha r)} \end{aligned} $$

Use Gauss' and Stokes' theorems (Appendix A) to convert Maxwell's differential equations for vacuum, \((82.1)\) to \((8.2 .4)\), to their integral form $$ \begin{aligned} &\oint_{S} \mathbf{E} \cdot d \mathbf{S}=\frac{q}{\epsilon_{0}} \\ &\oint_{L} \mathbf{E} \cdot d \mathbf{l}=-\frac{d \Phi_{m}}{d t} \\ &\oint_{S} \mathbf{B} \cdot d \mathbf{S}=0 \\ &\oint_{L} \mathbf{B} \cdot d \mathbf{l}=\mu_{0} I+\mu_{0} \frac{d \Phi_{*}}{d t} \end{aligned} $$ † See Sec. \(5.4\) and Prob. 8.2.4. where the closed surface \(S\) contains the net charge \(q\) and the closed line (loop) \(L\) is linked by the net current \(I\), the magnetic flux \(\Phi_{m}=\int \mathbf{B} \cdot d \mathbf{S}\), and the electric flux \(\Phi_{e}=\epsilon_{0} \int \mathbf{E} \cdot d \mathbf{S}\). Note: The corresponding equations for a general electromagnetic medium are developed in Prob. \(8.6 .1 .\)

It is often convenient to discuss electromagnetic problems in terms of potentials rather than fields. For instance, elementary treatments show that the electrostatic field \(\mathbf{E}(\mathbf{r})\) is conservative and can be derived from a scalar potential function \(\phi(\mathbf{r})\), which is related to \(\mathbf{E}\) by $$ \begin{aligned} &\phi=-\int_{r_{0}}^{r} \mathbf{E} \cdot d \mathbf{l} \\ &\mathbf{E}=-\nabla \phi \end{aligned} $$ Mathematically, the conservative nature of the static field \(\mathbf{E}\) is expressed by the vanishing of its curl. Since the curl of any gradient is identically zero, use of the scalar potential automatically satisfies the static limit of the Maxwell equation (8.2.2); the other constraint on \(\phi\) is Gauss' law (8.2.1). Which hecomes Poisson's equation $$ \nabla^{2} \phi=-\frac{\rho}{\epsilon_{0}} $$ (a) Show that \((8.2 .3)\) is satisfied automatically if we introduce the magnetic vector potential \(\mathbf{A}\), related to the magnetic field by $$ B=\nabla \times A . $$ (b) Show that in the general (nonstatic) case, the electric field is given in terms of the scalar and vector potentials by $$ \mathbf{E}=-\nabla \phi-\frac{\partial \mathbf{A}}{\partial t} $$ (c) Complete the prescription of \(\mathbf{A}\) by defining its divergence by the Lorents condition $$ \boldsymbol{\nabla} \cdot \mathbf{A}=-\frac{1}{c^{2}} \frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t} $$ and show that the two potentials obey the symmetrical inhomogeneous wave equations $$ \begin{aligned} &\nabla^{2} \phi-\frac{1}{c^{2}} \frac{\partial^{2} \phi}{\partial t^{2}}=-\frac{\rho}{\epsilon_{0}} \\ &\nabla^{2} \mathbf{A}-\frac{1}{c^{2}} \frac{\partial^{2} \mathbf{A}}{\partial t^{2}}=-\mu_{0} \mathbf{J} . \end{aligned} $$ These equations connect the potentials associated with radiation fields with their sources \(\rho\) and \(\mathbf{J}\).

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free