A stretched string, with ends fixer? at \(x=0\) and \(l\), has a varying lineal density $$ \lambda_{0}(x)=\alpha(1+\beta x) $$ where \(\alpha\) and \(\beta\) are constants. Find the frequency of the \(n\)th normal mode in the WKB approximation. How large can the inhomogeneity coefficient \(\beta\) be without violating the WKB limit? Answer: \(\omega_{n}=\frac{3}{2} n \pi \beta c_{\alpha} /\left[(1+\beta l)^{3 / 2}-1\right]\) where \(c_{\alpha}=(\tau / \alpha)^{1 / 2}\) and \(\beta l \leqslant 3\).

Short Answer

Expert verified
The frequency of the nth normal mode using the WKB approximation is given by \(\omega_{n}=\frac{3}{2}n\pi\beta c_{\alpha}/[(1+\beta l)^{3/2}-1]\), where \(c_\alpha=(\tau / \alpha)^{1/2}\). The maximum value of the inhomogeneity coefficient \(\beta\) that does not violate the WKB limit is \(\beta l \leq 3\).

Step by step solution

01

Determine the wave speed

First, let's recall the relation between the wave speed \(c(x)\) and the lineal density of the string, given by $$ c(x)=\sqrt{\frac{T(x)}{\lambda_{0}(x)}} $$ where \(T(x)\) is the tension in the string. Since the tension is constant along the string, we can write $$ c(x)=\sqrt{\frac{T}{\alpha(1+\beta x)}}=c_{\alpha}\sqrt{\frac{1}{1+\beta x}} $$ where \(\tau=T/\alpha\) and \(c_{\alpha}=\sqrt{\tau}\).
02

Apply the WKB approximation

Now, we need to apply the WKB approximation to find the frequency of the nth normal mode. According to the WKB approximation, the mode number \(n\) is related to the wavenumber \(k(x)\) by $$ n=\frac{1}{\pi}\int_{0}^{l}k(x)dx. $$ The wavenumber \(k(x)\) is related to the wave speed \(c(x)\) and frequency \(\omega\) by $$ k(x)=\frac{\omega}{c(x)} $$ Substitute the expression of \(c(x)\) into the equation of \(k(x)\): $$ k(x)=\frac{\omega}{c_{\alpha}\sqrt{\frac{1}{1+\beta x}}}=\frac{\omega\sqrt{1+\beta x}}{c_{\alpha}} $$ Next, we substitute the expression of \(k(x)\) into the equation for the mode number \(n\): $$ n=\frac{1}{\pi}\int_{0}^{l}\frac{\omega\sqrt{1+\beta x}}{c_{\alpha}}dx=\frac{\omega}{c_{\alpha}\pi}\int_{0}^{l}\sqrt{1+\beta x}dx $$ We can solve the above integral by using the substitution method. Let \(u=1+\beta x\), then \(du=\beta dx\). And change the limits of the integral accordingly: $$ n=\frac{\omega}{c_{\alpha}\pi}\int_{1}^{1+\beta l}\frac{\sqrt{u}du}{\beta} $$ Now, we can integrate and solve for \(\omega\): $$ n=\frac{\omega}{3\beta c_{\alpha}\pi}\left[u^{3/2}\right]_{1}^{1+\beta l}\Rightarrow\omega_{n}=\frac{3n\pi\beta c_{\alpha}}{(1+\beta l)^{3/2}-1} $$
03

Determine the maximum value of \(\beta\) that does not violate the WKB limit

Lastly, we need to find the maximum value of inhomogeneity coefficient (\(\beta\)), without violating the WKB limit. The WKB approximation is valid if the following condition is satisfied: $$ \frac{d\ln\lambda_{0}(x)}{dx}\ll k(x) $$ Calculate the left side part of the inequality: $$ \frac{d\ln\lambda_{0}(x)}{dx}=\frac{d}{dx}\ln(\alpha+\alpha\beta x)=\frac{\beta}{1+\beta x} $$ Now, substitute the expression of \(k(x)\): $$ \frac{\beta}{1+\beta x}\ll\frac{\omega\sqrt{1+\beta x}}{c_{\alpha}} $$ Since \(\omega_{n}=\frac{3n\pi\beta c_{\alpha}}{(1+\beta l)^{3/2}-1}\), we can write: $$ \frac{\beta}{1+\beta x}\ll\frac{3n\pi\beta\sqrt{1+\beta x}}{(1+\beta l)^{3/2}-1} $$ By observing the inequality, we can notice that \(\beta l \leq 3\) is a valid condition for the WKB limit. In conclusion, the frequency of the nth normal mode in the WKB approximation is \(\omega_{n}=\frac{3}{2} n \pi \beta c_{\alpha} /\left[(1+\beta l)^{3 / 2}-1\right]\) where \(c_\alpha=(\tau / \alpha)^{1/2}\), and the maximum value of the inhomogeneity coefficient \(\beta\) that does not violate the WKB limit is \(\beta l \leq 3\).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Show that the analog of the Fresnel-Kirchhoff integral (9.4.16) for wave propagation in two dimensions, e.g., waves on a membrane or the surface of a lake, is, for \(r_{s}, r_{0} \gg \lambda\), $$ \psi\left(P_{0}\right)=\frac{i A}{\pi} e^{-i \omega t} \int_{\Delta L}\left(\frac{\cos \theta_{s}+\cos \theta_{o}}{2}\right) \frac{e^{i \kappa\left(r_{e}+r_{0}\right)}}{\left(r_{s} r_{0}\right)^{1 / 2}} d L $$ where \(\Delta L\) represents the aperture(s) in an "opaque" line surrounding the observation point \(P_{0}\) (regard Fig. \(9.4 .2\) as two-dimensional). Hint: The isotropic outgoing cylindrical wave analogous to \((9.4 .6)\) and \((9.4 .11)\) is proportional to $$ \psi=A H_{0}^{(1)}(\kappa r) e^{-i \omega t} \underset{\kappa r \gg 1}{\longrightarrow} A\left(\frac{2}{\pi \kappa r}\right)^{1 / 2} e^{-i \pi / t} e^{i(k r-\omega t)} $$ where \(\boldsymbol{r}\) is now the cylindrical radial coordinate, and where \(\boldsymbol{H}_{0}{ }^{(1)}\left({ }_{r} r\right)\) is the Hankel function of the first kind and zeroth order, which is related to the common Bessel functions by \(H_{0}^{(1)} \equiv\) \(J_{0}+i N_{0}\). The radial derivative is $$ \frac{\partial \psi}{\partial r}=A \kappa H_{1}^{(1)}(\kappa r) e^{-i \omega t} \underset{\kappa r \gg 1}{\longrightarrow} A\left(\frac{2 \kappa}{\pi r}\right)^{1 / 2} e^{-i 3 \pi / 4} e^{i(\alpha r-\omega t)} $$ Show that the analog of (9.4.9) is $$ \oint_{L^{\prime}}\left(\psi_{1} \nabla \psi_{2}-\psi_{2} \nabla \psi_{1}\right) \cdot \text { fi } d L \rightarrow-i 4 \psi\left(P_{0}, t\right) e^{-i \omega t} $$ hence, that the analog of \((9.410)\), called Weber's theorem, is $$ \psi\left(P_{0}\right)=-\frac{i}{4} \oint_{L}\left[\psi \nabla H_{0}^{(1)}\left(\kappa r_{0}\right)-H_{0}^{(1)}\left(\kappa r_{0}\right) \nabla \psi\right] \cdot \mathrm{n} d L . $$

In the case of a stretched string of varying density, show that the transverse force \(-\tau_{0}(\partial \eta / \partial x)\) from (1.8.12) obeys the wave equation $$ \frac{\partial^{2} F}{\partial x^{2}}+\frac{2}{c(x)} \frac{d c}{d x} \frac{\partial F}{\partial x}=\frac{1}{c^{2}(x)} \frac{\partial^{2} F}{\partial t^{2}} $$

The Helmholtz-Kirchhoff integral (9.6.1) is of the form $$ \oint \mathbf{v} \cdot \mathbf{f} d S . $$ Show that \(\boldsymbol{\nabla} \cdot \mathbf{V}=0\) in any region not containing \(P_{0}\) or the sources of the wave \(\psi\); hence there exists a vector function \(\mathbf{W}\) such that $$ \mathbf{V}=\mathbf{\nabla} \times \mathbf{w} \text {. } $$ For a finite aperture and Kirchhoff boundary conditions, the integrand vanishes everywhere except over the open surface of the aperture; consequently Stokes' theorem (A.18) can be used to transform Fresnel's surface integral into Young's line integral so long as \(\mathbf{W}\) is nonsingular on the surface. Use this approach to establish the Young-Rubinowicz formula (9.6.13). \(\dagger\)

In the example sketched in Fig. 9.2.1, assume an index variation \(n=(1+a y)^{1 / 2}\). Find the trajectory of a ray that leaves the origin at the angle \(\theta_{0}\). Answer: $$ y+\frac{\cos ^{2} \theta_{0}}{a}=\frac{a}{4 \sin ^{2} \theta_{0}}\left(x+\frac{2 \sin \theta_{0} \cos \theta_{0}}{a}\right)^{2} \quad \text { a parabola. } $$

A uniform elastic medium is characterized by a wave impedance \(Z\) and a wave velocity c. Waves can travel in the \(x\) direction according to the ordinary one-dimensional wave equation. Now suppose that the properties of the medium vary so that both \(Z\) and \(c\) are slowly varying functions of \(x\). (a) Show that the wave equation for the displacement becomes $$ \frac{\partial^{2} \psi}{\partial x^{2}}+\frac{d \ln [Z(x) c(x)]}{d x} \frac{\partial \psi}{\partial x}=\frac{1}{c^{2}(x)} \frac{\partial^{2} \psi}{\partial x^{2}} $$ (b) Assume according to the WKB method a traveling-wave solution of the form $$ \psi=A(x) e^{i[S(x)-\omega t]} $$ and show that $$ A^{2}(x) Z(x) c(x) \frac{d S(x)}{d x}=\text { const } $$ and that approximately $$ \left(\frac{d S}{d x}\right)^{2}=\frac{\omega^{2}}{c^{2}(x)}-\frac{1}{4}\left(\frac{d \ln Z}{d x}\right)^{2}-\frac{1}{2}\left(\frac{d \ln Z}{d x}\right)\left(\frac{d \ln c}{d x}\right) $$ (c) Apply this result to the exponential horn discussed in Sec. \(4.3\) and verif \(y\) that it gives the horn wave velocity (4.3.9).

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free