Is Earth an inertial frame of reference? Is the sun? Justify your response.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Both the Earth and the Sun cannot be considered inertial frames of reference because they are subject to acceleration due to their respective motions. The Earth's rotation causes objects on its surface to experience centripetal acceleration and Coriolis forces, while the Sun's motion within the Milky Way galaxy also results in apparent forces affecting objects in its frame. Consequently, both the Earth and the Sun do not meet the criteria for an inertial frame of reference.

Step by step solution

01

Understand the motion of Earth and Sun

Both the Earth and the Sun are in motion relative to each other and other celestial bodies. Earth revolves around the Sun in an elliptical orbit, and also rotates on its own axis. The Sun, at the center of the solar system, exerts gravitational force on Earth and other planets, but it is also in motion around the center of the Milky Way galaxy.
02

Analyze Earth's motion as an inertial frame

Since Earth is revolving around the Sun and also rotating on its own axis, it is undergoing both translational and rotational motion. The centripetal acceleration experienced by an object at the Earth's surface due to its rotation is given by the equation \( a_c = r\omega^2 \), where \(r\) is the distance from the rotation axis and \(\omega\) is the angular velocity of Earth's rotation. Due to the centripetal acceleration, objects on the Earth's surface are subject to a small apparent force (the Coriolis force) that causes the objects to deviate slightly from a straight-line path, which does not meet the criteria of an inertial frame of reference. Therefore, the Earth cannot be considered an inertial frame of reference.
03

Analyze Sun's motion as an inertial frame

The Sun, although massive and exerting gravitational force on the planets in the solar system, is also in motion within the Milky Way galaxy. This motion makes the Sun an accelerating frame of reference. In this frame, objects are subject to apparent forces (e.g., centrifugal and Coriolis forces) that affect their motion, which violates the conditions for an inertial frame of reference. Therefore, the Sun also cannot be considered an inertial frame of reference.
04

Conclusion

Both the Earth and the Sun are not inertial frames of reference because they are subject to acceleration due to their respective motions. Consequently, objects within these frames experience apparent forces, which does not meet the criteria of an inertial frame of reference.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

A supemova explosion of a \(2.00 \times 10^{31} \mathrm{kg}\) star produces \(1.00 \times 10^{44} \mathrm{J} \quad\) of energy. (a) How many kilograms of mass are converted to energy in the explosion? (b) What is the ratio \(\Delta m / m\) of mass destroyed to the original mass of the star?

Two astronomical events are observed from Earth to occur at a time of 1 s apart and a distance separation of \(1.5 \times 10^{9} \mathrm{m}\) from each other. (a) Determine whether separation of the two events is space like or time like. (b) State what this implies about whether it is consistent with special relativity for one event to have caused the other?

How are the classical laws of conservation of energy and conservation of mass modified by modern relativity?

One cosmic ray neutron has a velocity of \(0.250 c\) relative to the Earth. (a) What is the neutron's total energy in MeV? (b) Find its momentum. (c) Is \(E \approx p c\) in this situation? Discuss in terms of the equation given in part (a) of the previous problem.

A spacecraft starts from being at rest at the origin and accelerates at a constant rate \(g\), as seen from Earth, taken to be an inertial frame, until it reaches a speed of \(c / 2\). (a) Show that the increment of proper time is related to the elapsed time in Earth's frame by: \(d \tau=\sqrt{1-v^{2} / c^{2}} d t\) (b) Find an expression for the elapsed time to reach speed C/2 as seen in Earth's frame. (c) Use the relationship in (a) to obtain a similar expression for the elapsed proper time to reach \(c / 2\) as seen in the spacecraft, and determine the ratio of the time seen from Earth with that on the spacecraft to reach the final speed.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free