Can we measure the energy of a free localized particle with complete precision?

Short Answer

Expert verified
No, we cannot measure the energy of a free localized particle with complete precision. According to the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle, the product of the uncertainties in position and energy is always greater than or equal to \(\frac{\hbar}{2}\). If we try to make the energy uncertainty very small, it would mean there is infinite uncertainty in the position, making the particle no longer localized. Therefore, it is not possible to measure the energy of a free localized particle with complete precision without sacrificing information about its position.

Step by step solution

01

Definition of the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle

The Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle is a fundamental principle in quantum mechanics that states the following relation for position (\(x\)) and momentum (\(p\)): \[\Delta x \cdot \Delta p \geq \frac{\hbar}{2}\] Here, \(\Delta x\) represents the uncertainty in position, \(\Delta p\) represents the uncertainty in momentum and \(\hbar\) is the reduced Planck constant (approximately \(1.05 \cdot 10^{-34} \, Js\)).
02

Energy uncertainty

Since the particle under consideration is free, it is not subject to any potential energy. Therefore, its total energy is equal to its kinetic energy. The kinetic energy of a particle can be expressed in terms of its momentum: \[E = \frac{p^2}{2m}\] Here, \(E\) is the energy, \(p\) is the momentum, and \(m\) is the mass of the particle. To find the uncertainty in energy, we can differentiate the kinetic energy expression with respect to the momentum: \[\frac{dE}{dp} = \frac{p}{m}\] Now, we can express the uncertainty in energy (\(\Delta E\)) in terms of the uncertainty in momentum (\(\Delta p\)): \[\Delta E = \frac{dE}{dp} \cdot \Delta p = \frac{p}{m} \cdot \Delta p\]
03

Uncertainty in energy and position

We're trying to find out if we can measure the energy of a free localized particle with complete precision. This means that we want the value of \(\Delta E\) to be as small as possible, ideally zero. However, we know from Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle that a decrease in the uncertainty of one variable (in this case, energy) leads to an increase in the uncertainty of its conjugate variable (position). Therefore, we can rewrite the uncertainty principle using the expression for \(\Delta E\): \[\Delta x \cdot \Delta E = \Delta x \cdot \frac{p}{m} \cdot \Delta p \geq \frac{\hbar}{2}\]
04

Analyzing the results

From the inequality derived in Step 3, we see that the product of the uncertainty in position and energy is always greater than or equal to \(\frac{\hbar}{2}\). If we try to make the uncertainty in energy (\(\Delta E\)) very small (ideally zero), it would mean there is infinite uncertainty in the position (\(\Delta x\)), making the particle no longer localized. The Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle does not allow for complete precision in measuring the energy of a localized particle without sacrificing information about its position. Therefore, it is not possible to measure the energy of a free localized particle with complete precision.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

When a quantum harmonic oscillator makes transition from the \((n+1)\) state to the \(n\) state and emits a \(450-\mathrm{nm}\) photon, what is its frequency?

In STM, an elevation of the tip above the surface being scanned can be determined with a great precision, because the tunneling-electron current between surface atoms and the atoms of the tip is extremely sensitive to the variation of the separation gap between them from point to point along the surface. Assuming that the tunneling-electron current is in direct proportion to the tunneling probability and that the tunneling probability is to a good approximation expressed by the exponential function \(e^{-2 \beta L}\) with \(\beta=10.0 / \mathrm{nm}\) determine the ratio of the tunneling current when the tip is \(0.500 \mathrm{nm}\) above the surface to the current when the tip is \(0.515 \mathrm{nm}\) above the surface.

A diatomic molecule behaves like a quantum harmonic oscillator with the force constant \(12.0 \mathrm{N} / \mathrm{m}\) and mass \(5.60 \times 10^{-26} \mathrm{kg}\). (a) What is the wavelength of the emitted photon when the molecule makes the transition from the third excited state to the second excited state? (b) Find the ground state energy of vibrations for this diatomic molecule.

Consider an infinite square well with wall boundaries \(x=0 \quad\) and \(\quad x=L . \quad\) Explain \(\quad\) why the function \(\psi(x)=A \cos k x \quad\) is not a solution to the stationary Schrödinger equation for the particle in a box.

An electron in a long, organic molecule used in a dye laser behaves approximately like a quantum particle in a box with width \(4.18 \mathrm{nm}\). Find the emitted photon when the electron makes a transition from the first excited state to the ground state and from the second excited state to the first excited state.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free