Log out Go to App
Go to App

Learning Materials

Features

Discover

Chapter 12: Problem 12

Can the expression for gravitational potential energy \(U_{\mathrm{g}}(y)=m g y\) be used to analyze high-altitude motion? Why or why not?

Short Answer

Expert verified
Explain your answer. Answer: No, the expression \(U_{\mathrm{g}}(y) = mgy\) is not suitable for analyzing high-altitude motion as it relies on the assumption of a constant gravitational field, which breaks down at high altitudes. Instead, the general potential energy formula, \(U(r)=-\frac{GMm}{r}\), should be used for high-altitude motion analysis, as it accounts for the varying gravitational field with distance from the Earth's center.

Step by step solution

01

Understand the expression for gravitational potential energy

The gravitational potential energy of an object is the energy that it possesses due to its position in the gravitational field. The formula for gravitational potential energy is given by \(U_{\mathrm{g}}(y) = mgy\), where \(m\) is the mass of the object, \(g\) is the acceleration due to gravity, and \(y\) is the height of the object from the reference point, often Earth's surface.
02

Assumptions in the expression for gravitational potential energy

The formula \(U_{\mathrm{g}}(y) = mgy\) is derived under certain assumptions. The primary assumption is that the Earth's gravitational field is uniform, i.e., the value of \(g\) is constant throughout the region of interest. This assumption holds true for motion near the Earth's surface where the changes in the gravitational field are negligible. However, at very high altitudes, the Earth's gravitational field is no longer uniform as gravity weakens with distance from the Earth's center.
03

Considering high-altitude motion

High-altitude motion refers to motion at great distances from the Earth's surface, where the gravitational field is not uniform. The expression \(U_{\mathrm{g}}(y) = mgy\) is based on the assumption of a constant gravitational field. At high altitudes, it becomes crucial to account for the varying gravitational field by using the general potential energy formula, \(U(r)=-\frac{GMm}{r}\), where \(M\) is the Earth's mass, \(r\) is the distance from the object to the center of the Earth, and \(G\) is the gravitational constant.
04

Conclusion

Therefore, the expression \(U_{\mathrm{g}}(y) = mgy\) cannot be used to analyze high-altitude motion, as it relies on the assumption of a constant gravitational field. This assumption breaks down at high altitudes where changes in the gravitational field become significant. Instead, the general potential energy formula that considers the changes in the gravitational field should be used for high-altitude motion analysis.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Start your free trial

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Determine the minimum amount of energy that a projectile of mass \(100.0 \mathrm{~kg}\) must gain to reach a circular orbit \(10.00 \mathrm{~km}\) above the Earth's surface if launched from (a) the North Pole or from (b) the Equator (keep answers to four significant figures). Do not be concerned about the direction of the launch or of the final orbit. Is there an advantage or disadvantage to launching from the Equator? If so, how significant is the difference? Do not neglect the rotation of the Earth when calculating the initial energies.

Suppose a new extrasolar planet is discovered. Its mass is double the mass of the Earth, but it has the same density and spherical shape as the Earth. How would the weight of an object at the new planet's surface differ from its weight on Earth?

Three asteroids, located at points \(P_{1}, P_{2},\) and \(P_{3}\), which are not in a line, and having known masses \(m_{1}, m_{2}\), and \(m_{3}\), interact with one another through their mutual gravitational forces only; they are isolated in space and do not interact with any other bodies. Let \(\sigma\) denote the axis going through the center of mass of the three asteroids, perpendicular to the triangle \(P_{1} P_{2} P_{3} .\) What conditions should the angular velocity \(\omega\) of the system (around the axis \(\sigma\) ) and the distances $$ P_{1} P_{2}=a_{12}, \quad P_{2} P_{3}=a_{23}, \quad P_{1} P_{3}=a_{13} $$ fulfill to allow the shape and size of the triangle \(P_{1} P_{2} P_{3}\) to remain unchanged during the motion of the system? That is, under what conditions does the system rotate around the axis \(\sigma\) as a rigid body?

Imagine that two tunnels are bored completely through the Earth, passing through the center. Tunnel 1 is along the Earth's axis of rotation, and tunnel 2 is in the equatorial plane, with both ends at the Equator. Two identical balls, each with a mass of \(5.00 \mathrm{~kg}\), are simultaneously dropped into both tunnels. Neglect air resistance and friction from the tunnel walls. Do the balls reach the center of the Earth (point \(C\) ) at the same time? If not, which ball reaches the center of the Earth first?

A scientist working for a space agency noticed that a Russian satellite of mass \(250 . \mathrm{kg}\) is on collision course with an American satellite of mass \(600 .\) kg orbiting at \(1000 . \mathrm{km}\) above the surface. Both satellites are moving in circular orbits but in opposite directions. If the two satellites collide and stick together, will they continue to orbit or crash to the Earth? Explain.
See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

Further Mechanics and Thermal Physics

Read Explanation

Waves Physics

Read Explanation

Measurements

Read Explanation

Electrostatics

Read Explanation

Energy Physics

Read Explanation

Nuclear Physics

Read Explanation
View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free