Why might a hiker prefer a plastic bottle to an old-fashioned aluminum canteen for carrying his drinking water?

Short Answer

Expert verified
Answer: A hiker might prefer a plastic bottle due to its lighter weight, better thermal insulation, preservation of taste, flexibility, and potential environmental benefits depending on the materials used in each bottle. However, personal preferences and specific bottle qualities may also influence their decision.

Step by step solution

01

Weight Comparison

First, we need to compare the weight of a plastic bottle with an aluminum canteen. In general, plastic bottles tend to be lighter than aluminum canteens. When hiking, carrying less weight is crucial for comfort and energy conservation, so a hiker might prefer a lighter plastic bottle.
02

Thermal Properties

Next, compare the thermal properties of both materials. Aluminum is a good conductor of heat, resulting in a faster change of water temperature inside the canteen depending on the outside temperature. On the other hand, a good quality plastic bottle can provide better insulation than an aluminum canteen - it can keep the water cooler for a longer period in hot temperatures and prevent it from freezing in cold environments. This might be another reason why a hiker would prefer a plastic bottle.
03

Taste Preservation

Aluminum canteens can sometimes leave a metallic taste in the water, especially if the water has been stored for some time. Meanwhile, good quality plastic bottles are usually made from food-grade materials that don't affect the taste of the water. So a hiker might prefer a plastic bottle to avoid altering the taste of their drinking water.
04

Durability and Flexibility

Although aluminum canteens are typically more durable than plastic bottles, they can be prone to denting when dropped or hit hard, which can lead to leaks. Also, aluminum canteens might crack when exposed to very low temperatures. Plastic bottles, on the other hand, are less likely to crack or dent, offering more flexibility. A hiker might choose a plastic bottle to avoid possible damage caused by accidents or temperature changes.
05

Environmentally Friendly Option

Lastly, the hiker might take environmental considerations into account when choosing between a plastic bottle and an aluminum canteen. While both materials have associated environmental impacts, choosing a reusable plastic bottle made from recycled materials might be considered a more environmentally friendly option than an aluminum canteen, depending on the manufacturing process and materials used in each. It should be noted that using a reusable bottle, whether plastic or aluminum, is more sustainable than continuously using disposable plastic bottles that contribute to plastic pollution. In conclusion, a hiker might prefer a plastic bottle for carrying their drinking water due to its lighter weight, better thermal insulation, preservation of taste, flexibility, and potential environmental benefits. However, the choice ultimately depends on personal preferences, the specific qualities of each bottle, and environmental factors considered by the hiker.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The \(R\) factor for housing insulation gives the thermal resistance in units of \(\mathrm{ft}^{2}{ }^{\circ} \mathrm{F} \mathrm{h} / \mathrm{BTU}\). A good wall for harsh climates, corresponding to about 10.0 in of fiberglass, has \(R=40.0 \mathrm{ft}^{2}{ }^{\circ} \mathrm{F} \mathrm{h} / \mathrm{BTU}\) a) Determine the thermal resistance in SI units. b) Find the heat flow per square meter through a wall that has insulation with an \(R\) factor of 40.0 , with an outside temperature of \(-22.0^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\) and an inside temperature of \(23.0^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\)

Which of the following does not radiate heat? a) ice cube b) liquid nitrogen c) liquid helium d) a device at \(T=0.010 \mathrm{~K}\) e) all of the above f) none of the above

A gas has an initial volume of \(2.00 \mathrm{~m}^{3}\). It is expanded to three times its original volume through a process for which \(P=\alpha V^{3},\) with \(\alpha=4.00 \mathrm{~N} / \mathrm{m}^{11} .\) How much work is done by the expanding gas?

How would the rate of heat transfer between a thermal reservoir at a higher temperature and one at a lower temperature differ if the reservoirs were in contact with a 10 -cm-long glass rod instead of a 10 -m-long aluminum rod having an identical cross-sectional area?

In one of your rigorous workout sessions, you lost \(150 \mathrm{~g}\) of water through evaporation. Assume that the amount of work done by your body was \(1.80 \cdot 10^{5} \mathrm{~J}\) and that the heat required to evaporate the water came from your body. a) Find the loss in internal energy of your body, assuming the latent heat of vaporization is \(2.42 \cdot 10^{6} \mathrm{~J} / \mathrm{kg}\). b) Determine the minimum number of food calories that must be consumed to replace the internal energy lost (1 food calorie \(=4186\) J).

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free