While looking at a very small system, a scientist observes that the entropy of the system spontaneously decreases. If true, is this a Nobel-winning discovery or is it not that significant?

Short Answer

Expert verified
Explain your answer. Answer: While spontaneous decreases in entropy in very small systems are intriguing and seemingly challenge the Second Law of Thermodynamics, it is too early to claim them as Nobel-winning discoveries. In small systems, statistical fluctuations or quantum phenomena might play a significant role, leading to short-lived effects or experimental errors. Further research and investigation are needed to confirm the observation's validity and general applicability. To earn a Nobel prize, the scientist would need to show how these findings impact our understanding of entropy, thermodynamics, and their applications in various fields of science, technology, and engineering.

Step by step solution

01

Understand Entropy

Entropy is a measure of the disorder or randomness in a thermal system. In natural systems, the Second Law of Thermodynamics states that the total entropy of an isolated system can never decrease over time; it can only increase or remain the same. This principle is based on the observation that energy tends to disperse and spread out uniformly.
02

Evaluate the Significance of the Observation

A spontaneous decrease in entropy of a system is an extraordinary observation, as it goes against the Second Law of Thermodynamics. If this observation is true and can be replicated consistently under similar conditions, it might challenge our understanding of fundamental physics.
03

Consider the System's Size and Relevance

The exercise mentions that the scientist is observing a "very small system." It is important to note that statistical fluctuations or quantum phenomena might play a significant role in the behavior of such small systems. The decrease in entropy might be a short-lived effect due to unaccounted factors or experimental errors. If the same phenomenon could be observed in larger systems, it would raise more questions and potentially be of more significant importance.
04

Nobel-winning Discovery or Not?

It is too early to claim whether this observation is a Nobel-winning discovery. While it is certainly intriguing and challenges our understanding of thermodynamics, further research and investigation are needed to confirm the observation's validity and general applicability. More importantly, the scientist would need to show how these findings could impact our understanding of entropy, thermodynamics, and their applications in various fields of science, technology, and engineering.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

What capacity must a heat pump with a coefficient of performance of 3 have to heat a home that loses heat energy at a rate of \(12 \mathrm{~kW}\) on the coldest day of the year? a) \(3 \mathrm{~kW}\) c) \(10 \mathrm{~kW}\) e) \(40 \mathrm{~kW}\) b) \(4 \mathrm{~kW}\) d) \(30 \mathrm{~kW}\)

An inventor claims that he has created a water-driven engine with an efficiency of 0.200 that operates between thermal reservoirs at \(4^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\) and \(20 .{ }^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\). Is this claim valid?

Suppose a person metabolizes \(2000 .\) kcal/day. a) With a core body temperature of \(37.0^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\) and an ambient temperature of \(20.0^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\), what is the maximum (Carnot) efficiency with which the person can perform work? b) If the person could work with that efficiency, at what rate, in watts, would they have to shed waste heat to the surroundings? c) With a skin area of \(1.50 \mathrm{~m}^{2}\), a skin temperature of \(27.0^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\) and an effective emissivity of \(e=0.600,\) at what net rate does this person radiate heat to the \(20.0^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\) surroundings? d) The rest of the waste heat must be removed by evaporating water, either as perspiration or from the lungs At body temperature, the latent heat of vaporization of water is \(575 \mathrm{cal} / \mathrm{g}\). At what rate, in grams per hour, does this person lose water? e) Estimate the rate at which the person gains entropy. Assume that all the required evaporation of water takes place in the lungs, at the core body temperature of \(37.0^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\).

Which of the following processes always results in an increase in the energy of a system? a) The system loses heat and does work on the surroundings. b) The system gains heat and does work on the surroundings. c) The system loses heat and has work done on it by the surroundings. d) The system gains heat and has work done on it by the surroundings. e) None of the above.

Consider a Carnot engine that works between thermal reservoirs with temperatures of \(1000.0 \mathrm{~K}\) and \(300.0 \mathrm{~K}\). The average power of the engine is \(1.00 \mathrm{~kJ}\) per cycle. a) What is the efficiency of this engine? b) How much energy is extracted from the warmer reservoir per cycle? c) How much energy is delivered to the cooler reservoir?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free