It would be mathematically possible, for a region with zero current density, to define a scalar magnetic potential analogous to the electrostatic potential: \(V_{B}(\vec{r})=-\int_{\vec{r}_{0}}^{\vec{r}} \vec{B} \cdot d \vec{s},\) or \(\vec{B}(\vec{r})=-\nabla V_{B}(\vec{r}) .\) However, this has not been done. Explain why not.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Explain. Answer: No, a scalar magnetic potential analogous to the electrostatic potential cannot be defined for regions with zero current density. This is because magnetic fields always have a zero divergence and have a swirling nature that cannot be captured by the gradient of a scalar potential. In some cases, the Laplacian of the scalar potential is non-zero, not fulfilling the requirement \(\nabla \cdot \vec{B} = 0\), and hence, it is not generally applicable to every magnetic field configuration.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding the electrostatic potential

Recall that the electrostatic potential V is defined for a region with a conservative electric field \(\vec{E}\). In this case, the electrostatic potential is represented by the scalar quantity: \(V(\vec{r})=-\int_{\vec{r}_{0}}^{\vec{r}} \vec{E} \cdot d\vec{s}\), where \(\vec{E}(\vec{r})=-\nabla V(\vec{r})\). This means that the electrostatic potential V can be defined for a given region, with the electric field being the gradient of V in that region.
02

Considering the analogous scalar potential for magnetic fields

Now, let's consider whether a similar scalar potential, \(V_B\), could be defined for the magnetic field, \(\vec{B}\), in a region with a zero current density. The proposed potential would be: \(V_{B}(\vec{r})=-\int_{\vec{r}_{0}}^{\vec{r}} \vec{B} \cdot d\vec{s},\) or \(\vec{B}(\vec{r})=-\nabla V_{B}(\vec{r})\).
03

Analyzing the fundamental differences between electric and magnetic fields

One fundamental difference between electric and magnetic fields is that electric fields can be produced by point charges, while magnetic fields are produced by moving charges (currents). Consequently, electric fields can have a divergence, while magnetic fields always have a zero divergence, which is expressed in Maxwell's equations as \(\nabla \cdot \vec{B} = 0\).
04

Explaining why scalar magnetic potential cannot be defined

Having a scalar potential \(V_B\) for \(\vec{B}\) would mean that \(\vec{B}=-\nabla V_{B}\). If true, this would lead to the following mathematical formulation: \(\nabla \cdot \vec{B} = -\nabla \cdot (\nabla V_{B}) = -\nabla^{2} V_{B} = 0\) However, it is not guaranteed that there is always a scalar field \(V_B\) that could satisfy this condition for every possible magnetic field configuration. This is because of the swirling nature of magnetic fields, which cannot be captured by the gradient of a scalar potential. In other words, there can be situations where the Laplacian of the scalar potential is non-zero, and thus, not fulfilling the requirement \(\nabla \cdot \vec{B} = 0\). That is why a scalar magnetic potential cannot be defined analogous to the electrostatic potential. In conclusion, while the scalar potential might work for some specific cases, it is not generally applicable to every magnetic field configuration, which is why it has not been defined for regions with zero current density.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The figure shows a schematic diagram of a simple mass spectrometer, consisting of a velocity selector and a particle detector and being used to separate singly ionized atoms \(\left(q=+e=1.60 \cdot 10^{-19} \mathrm{C}\right)\) of gold \((\mathrm{Au})\) and molybdenum (Mo). The electric field inside the velocity selector has magnitude \(E=1.789 \cdot 10^{4} \mathrm{~V} / \mathrm{m}\) and points toward the top of the page, and the magnetic field has magnitude \(B_{1}=1.00 \mathrm{~T}\) and points out of the page. a) Draw the electric force vector, \(\vec{F}_{E},\) and the magnetic force vector, \(\vec{F}_{B},\) acting on the ions inside the velocity selector. b) Calculate the velocity, \(v_{0}\), of the ions that make it through the velocity selector (those that travel in a straight line). Does \(v_{0}\) depend on the type of ion (gold versus molybdenum), or is it the same for both types of ions? c) Write the equation for the radius of the semicircular path of an ion in the particle detector: \(R=R\left(m, v_{0}, q, B_{2}\right)\). d) The gold ions (represented by the black circles) exit the particle detector at a distance \(d_{2}=40.00 \mathrm{~cm}\) from the entrance slit, while the molybdenum ions (represented by the gray circles) exit the particle detector at a distance \(d_{1}=19.81 \mathrm{~cm}\) from the entrance slit. The mass of a gold ion is \(m_{\text {gold }}=\) \(3.27 \cdot 10^{-25}\) kg. Calculate the mass of a molybdenum ion.

A proton moving with a speed of \(4.0 \cdot 10^{5} \mathrm{~m} / \mathrm{s}\) in the positive \(y\) -direction enters a uniform magnetic field of \(0.40 \mathrm{~T}\) pointing in the positive \(x\) -direction. Calculate the magnitude of the force on the proton.

An electron moves in a circular trajectory with radius \(r_{\mathrm{i}}\) in a constant magnetic field. What is the final radius of the trajectory when the magnetic field is doubled? a) \(\frac{r_{i}}{4}\) b) \(\frac{r_{i}}{2}\) c) \(r_{i}\) d) \(2 r_{i}\) e) \(4 r_{\mathrm{i}}\)

An alpha particle \(\left(m=6.6 \cdot 10^{-27} \mathrm{~kg}, q=+2 e\right)\) is accelerated by a potential difference of \(2700 \mathrm{~V}\) and moves in a plane perpendicular to a constant magnetic field of magnitude \(0.340 \mathrm{~T}\), which curves the trajectory of the alpha particle. Determine the radius of curvature and the period of revolution.

A straight wire of length \(2.00 \mathrm{~m}\) carries a current of \(24.0 \mathrm{~A} .\) It is placed on a horizontal tabletop in a uniform horizontal magnetic field. The wire makes an angle of \(30.0^{\circ}\) with the magnetic field lines. If the magnitude of the force on the wire is \(0.500 \mathrm{~N}\), what is the magnitude of the magnetic field?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free