It would be mathematically possible, for a region with zero current density, to define a scalar magnetic potential analogous to the electrostatic potential: \(V_{B}(\vec{r})=-\int_{\vec{r}_{0}}^{\vec{r}} \vec{B} \cdot d \vec{s},\) or \(\vec{B}(\vec{r})=-\nabla V_{B}(\vec{r}) .\) However, this has not been done. Explain why not.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Explain. Answer: No, a scalar magnetic potential analogous to the electrostatic potential cannot be defined for regions with zero current density. This is because magnetic fields always have a zero divergence and have a swirling nature that cannot be captured by the gradient of a scalar potential. In some cases, the Laplacian of the scalar potential is non-zero, not fulfilling the requirement \(\nabla \cdot \vec{B} = 0\), and hence, it is not generally applicable to every magnetic field configuration.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding the electrostatic potential

Recall that the electrostatic potential V is defined for a region with a conservative electric field \(\vec{E}\). In this case, the electrostatic potential is represented by the scalar quantity: \(V(\vec{r})=-\int_{\vec{r}_{0}}^{\vec{r}} \vec{E} \cdot d\vec{s}\), where \(\vec{E}(\vec{r})=-\nabla V(\vec{r})\). This means that the electrostatic potential V can be defined for a given region, with the electric field being the gradient of V in that region.
02

Considering the analogous scalar potential for magnetic fields

Now, let's consider whether a similar scalar potential, \(V_B\), could be defined for the magnetic field, \(\vec{B}\), in a region with a zero current density. The proposed potential would be: \(V_{B}(\vec{r})=-\int_{\vec{r}_{0}}^{\vec{r}} \vec{B} \cdot d\vec{s},\) or \(\vec{B}(\vec{r})=-\nabla V_{B}(\vec{r})\).
03

Analyzing the fundamental differences between electric and magnetic fields

One fundamental difference between electric and magnetic fields is that electric fields can be produced by point charges, while magnetic fields are produced by moving charges (currents). Consequently, electric fields can have a divergence, while magnetic fields always have a zero divergence, which is expressed in Maxwell's equations as \(\nabla \cdot \vec{B} = 0\).
04

Explaining why scalar magnetic potential cannot be defined

Having a scalar potential \(V_B\) for \(\vec{B}\) would mean that \(\vec{B}=-\nabla V_{B}\). If true, this would lead to the following mathematical formulation: \(\nabla \cdot \vec{B} = -\nabla \cdot (\nabla V_{B}) = -\nabla^{2} V_{B} = 0\) However, it is not guaranteed that there is always a scalar field \(V_B\) that could satisfy this condition for every possible magnetic field configuration. This is because of the swirling nature of magnetic fields, which cannot be captured by the gradient of a scalar potential. In other words, there can be situations where the Laplacian of the scalar potential is non-zero, and thus, not fulfilling the requirement \(\nabla \cdot \vec{B} = 0\). That is why a scalar magnetic potential cannot be defined analogous to the electrostatic potential. In conclusion, while the scalar potential might work for some specific cases, it is not generally applicable to every magnetic field configuration, which is why it has not been defined for regions with zero current density.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The magnitude of the magnetic force on a particle with charge \(-2 e\) moving with speed \(v=1.0 \cdot 10^{5} \mathrm{~m} / \mathrm{s}\) is \(3.0 \cdot 10^{-18} \mathrm{~N}\). What is the magnitude of the magnetic field component perpendicular to the direction of motion of the particle?

A helium leak detector uses a mass spectrometer to detect tiny leaks in a vacuum chamber. The chamber is evacuated with a vacuum pump and then sprayed with helium gas on the outside. If there is any leak, the helium molecules pass through the leak and into the chamber, whose volume is sampled by the leak detector. In the spectrometer, helium ions are accelerated and released into a tube, where their motion is perpendicular to an applied magnetic field, \(\vec{B},\) and they follow a circular orbit of radius \(r\) and then hit a detector. Estimate the velocity required if the orbital radius of the ions is to be no more than \(5 \mathrm{~cm},\) the magnetic field is \(0.15 \mathrm{~T}\) and the mass of a helium- 4 atom is about \(6.6 \cdot 10^{-27} \mathrm{~kg}\). Assume that each ion is singly ionized (has one electron less than the neutral atom). By what factor does the required velocity change if helium- 3 atoms, which have about \(\frac{3}{4}\) as much mass as helium- 4 atoms, are used?

The velocity selector described in Solved Problem 27.2 is used in a variety of devices to produce a beam of charged particles of uniform velocity. Suppose the fields in such a selector are given by \(\vec{E}=\left(1.00 \cdot 10^{4} \mathrm{~V} / \mathrm{m}\right) \hat{x}\) and \(\vec{B}=(50.0 \mathrm{mT}) \hat{y} .\) Find the velocity in the \(z\) -direction with which a charged particle can travel through the selector without being deflected.

A simple galvanometer is made from a coil that consists of \(N\) loops of wire of area \(A .\) The coil is attached to a mass, \(M\), by a light rigid rod of length \(L\). With no current in the coil, the mass hangs straight down, and the coil lies in a horizontal plane. The coil is in a uniform magnetic field of magnitude \(B\) that is oriented horizontally. Calculate the angle from the vertical of the rigid rod as a function of the current, \(i\), in the coil.

A charged particle moves under the influence of an electric field only. Is it possible for the particle to move with a constant speed? What if the electric field is replaced with a magnetic field?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free