A gravitational lens should produce a halo effect and not arcs. Given that the light travels not only to the right and left of the intervening massive object but also to the top and bottom, why do we typically see only arcs?

Short Answer

Expert verified
Answer: We typically observe arcs in gravitational lensing images rather than complete halos because the alignment between the source, the intervening massive object, and the observer is usually imperfect and asymmetrical. This imperfect alignment favors the formation of partial segments of Einstein rings (arcs) rather than perfectly formed circular halos. Furthermore, the light paths from the top and bottom may also contribute to arc formation, but their visibility might be limited by various factors such as the lensing geometry, the source's brightness, and the mass distribution of the massive object.

Step by step solution

01

Understand gravitational lensing

Gravitational lensing is a phenomenon where the path of light is bent as it passes through the gravitational field of a massive object. This bending of light causes the light from a distant source to arrive at an observer from different angles, creating multiple images or distorted images of the source.
02

Visualize the light paths around a massive object

Imagine a massive object, like a galaxy or a black hole, situated between a distant light source and an observer. The light emitted by the source will travel in all directions. When the light passes close to the massive object, its path is bent due to the object's gravitational field.
03

Geometry of the arcs

The shape of the resulting images depends on the geometry of the lensing system, including the alignment between the source, the intervening massive object, and the observer. When the light paths are perfectly symmetrical around the massive object, we would expect to see a complete circle, known as an "Einstein ring." However, in most cases, the alignment is not perfect, and the light paths are more prominent in some directions than others.
04

Explain why arcs are more common than complete halos

Typically, we observe arcs rather than complete halos due to the relative alignment of the source, the massive object, and the observer. The likelihood of a perfectly symmetrical alignment is very low, making Einstein rings relatively rare. Instead, the geometry generally favors arcs, which are partial segments of the idealized Einstein ring. Additionally, any deviation from perfect symmetry can lead to a distortion of the images along a particular axis, either horizontally or vertically, causing the formation of arcs rather than a full halo.
05

Light paths from the top and bottom

The light paths coming from the top and bottom of the intervening massive object are indeed also bent by the gravitational field. However, these light paths may not necessarily lead to the formation of observable arcs. Factors such as the specific lensing geometry, the brightness of the source, and the spatial distribution of the massive object's mass can contribute to the dominance of the arcs observed in one direction over the other. In some cases, arcs may be present, but too faint to be detected easily. In conclusion, the main reason why we typically see arcs instead of complete halos in gravitational lensing situations is due to the imperfect alignment and asymmetrical geometry of the source, massive object, and observer in most lensing systems. This imperfect alignment favors the formation of partial segments of Einstein rings (arcs) rather than perfectly formed circular halos. Additionally, light paths from the top and bottom may also contribute to arc formation, but their visibility might be limited by various factors.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

In mechanics, one often uses the model of a perfectly rigid body to model and determine the motion of physical objects (see, for example, Chapter 10 on rotation). Explain how this model contradicts Einstein's special theory of relativity.

Two twins, \(A\) and \(B\), are in deep space on similar rockets traveling in opposite directions with a relative speed of \(c / 4\). After a while, twin A turns around and travels back toward twin \(\mathrm{B}\) again, so that their relative speed is \(c / 4\). When they meet again, is one twin younger, and if so which twin is younger? a) Twin A is younger. d) Each twin thinks b) Twin \(B\) is younger. the other is younger. c) The twins are the same age.

Two stationary space stations are separated by a distance of \(100 .\) light- years, as measured by someone on one of the space stations. A spaceship traveling at \(0.950 c\) relative to the space stations passes by one of the space stations heading directly toward the other one. How long will it take to reach the other space station, as measured by someone on the spaceship? How much time will have passed for a traveler on the spaceship as it travels from one space station to the other, as measured by someone on one of the space stations? Round the answers to the nearest year.

A proton with a momentum of \(3.0 \mathrm{GeV} / \mathrm{c}\) is moving with what velocity relative to the observer? a) \(0.31 c\) c) \(0.91 c\) e) \(3.2 c\) b) \(0.33 c\) d) \(0.95 c\)

Although it deals with inertial reference frames, the special theory of relativity describes accelerating objects without difficulty. Of course, uniform acceleration no longer means \(d v / d t=g,\) where \(g\) is a constant, since that would have \(v\) exceeding \(c\) in a finite time. Rather, it means that the acceleration experienced by the moving body is constant: In each increment of the body's own proper time \(d \tau,\) the body acquires velocity increment \(d v=g d \tau\) as measured in the inertial frame in which the body is momentarily at rest. (As it accelerates, the body encounters a sequence of such frames, each moving with respect to the others.) Given this interpretation: a) Write a differential equation for the velocity \(v\) of the body, moving in one spatial dimension, as measured in the inertial frame in which the body was initially at rest (the "ground frame"). You can simplify your equation, remembering that squares and higher powers of differentials can be neglected. b) Solve this equation for \(v(t),\) where both \(v\) and \(t\) are measured in the ground frame. c) Verify that your solution behaves appropriately for small and large values of \(t\). d) Calculate the position of the body \(x(t),\) as measured in the ground frame. For convenience, assume that the body is at rest at ground-frame time \(t=0,\) at ground-frame position \(x=c^{2} / g\) e) Identify the trajectory of the body on a space-time diagram (Minkowski diagram, for Hermann Minkowski) with coordinates \(x\) and \(c t,\) as measured in the ground frame. f) For \(g=9.81 \mathrm{~m} / \mathrm{s}^{2},\) calculate how much time it takes the body to accelerate from rest to \(70.7 \%\) of \(c,\) measured in the ground frame, and how much ground-frame distance the body covers in this time.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free