Suppose you are explaining the theory of relativity to a friend, and you have told him that nothing can go faster than \(300,000 \mathrm{~km} / \mathrm{s}\). He says that is obviously false: Suppose a spaceship traveling past you at \(200,000 \mathrm{~km} / \mathrm{s}\), which is perfectly possible according to what you are saying, fires a torpedo straight ahead whose speed is \(200,000 \mathrm{~km} / \mathrm{s}\) relative to the spaceship, which is also perfectly possible; then, he says, the torpedo's speed is \(400,000 \mathrm{~km} / \mathrm{s}\). How would you answer him?

Short Answer

Expert verified
In the given scenario of a spaceship and a torpedo, the theory of relativity takes into account the combination of their velocities and ensures that the total velocity does not exceed the speed of light (\(300,000 \mathrm{~km} / \mathrm{s}\)). According to special relativity's velocity addition formula, the relative velocity of the torpedo with respect to the observer is approximately \(327,273 \mathrm{~km} / \mathrm{s}\), which is less than the speed of light. Therefore, there is no contradiction, and the student's misconception is addressed.

Step by step solution

01

Introduce the Principle of Relativity

The theory of relativity states that the laws of physics are the same for all inertial observers, regardless of their relative velocities. In this case, we have a spaceship and a torpedo that are moving relative to an observer.
02

Explain Velocity Addition in Classical Mechanics

In classical mechanics, velocities simply add together. According to this framework, if the spaceship is traveling at \(200,000 \mathrm{~km} / \mathrm{s}\) and the torpedo is traveling at \(200,000 \mathrm{~km} / \mathrm{s}\) relative to the spaceship, the student is correct that the total speed would be \(400,000 \mathrm{~km} / \mathrm{s}\), which appears to contradict the theory of relativity.
03

Explain Velocity Addition in Special Relativity

However, special relativity provides a different equation for combining velocities, accounting for the fact that nothing can travel faster than the speed of light (\(300,000 \mathrm{~km} / \mathrm{s}\)). The relativistic velocity addition formula is given by: \(v = \frac{v_1 + v_2}{1 + \frac{v_1 v_2}{c^2}}\), where \(v\) is the relative velocity between the two objects, \(v_1\) and \(v_2\) are their individual velocities, and \(c\) is the speed of light.
04

Calculate the Relative Velocity of the Torpedo

Using the given example, let's calculate the relative velocity of the torpedo (in km/s) with respect to the observer: \(v_1 = 200,000 \mathrm{~km} / \mathrm{s}\) (spaceship velocity) \(v_2 = 200,000 \mathrm{~km} / \mathrm{s}\) (torpedo velocity relative to the spaceship) \(c = 300,000 \mathrm{~km} / \mathrm{s}\) (speed of light) Plug these values into the relativistic velocity addition formula: \(v = \frac{200,000 + 200,000}{1 + \frac{200,000 \cdot 200,000}{300,000^2}}\) \(v = \frac{400,000}{1 + \frac{40,000,000,000}{90,000,000,000}}\) \(v = \frac{400,000}{1 + \frac{2}{9}}\) \(v = \frac{400,000}{\frac{11}{9}}\) \(v = \frac{400,000 \cdot 9}{11}\) \(v \approx 327,273 \mathrm{~km} / \mathrm{s}\)
05

Conclusion

The relative velocity of the torpedo with respect to the observer is approximately \(327,273 \mathrm{~km} / \mathrm{s}\), which is less than the speed of light, \(300,000 \mathrm{~km} / \mathrm{s}\). Thus, the theory of relativity holds true and the student's misconception is cleared. There is no contradiction, and no object can travel faster than the speed of light according to the theory of relativity.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Michelson and Morley used an interferometer to show that the speed of light is constant, regardless of Earth's motion through any perceived luminiferous aether. An analogy can be understood from the different times it takes for a rowboat to travel two different round-trip paths in a river that flows at a constant velocity \((u)\) downstream. Let one path be for a distance \(D\) directly across the river, then back again; and let the other path be the same distance \(D\) directly upstream, then back again. Assume that the rowboat travels at constant speed, \(v\) (with respect to the water), for both trips. Neglect the time it takes for the rowboat to turn around. Find the ratio of the cross-stream time divided by the upstream-downstream time, as a function of the given constants.

In the twin paradox example, Alice boards a spaceship that flies to a space station 3.25 light-years away and then returns with a speed of \(0.65 c\). a) Calculate the total distance Alice traveled during the trip, as measured by Alice. b) With the aforementioned total distance, calculate the total time duration for the trip, as measured by Alice.

Show that \(E^{2}-p^{2} c^{2}=E^{2}-p^{2} c^{2},\) that is, that \(E^{2}-p^{2} c^{2}\) is a Lorentz invariant. Hint: Look at derivation showing that the space-time interval is a Lorentz invariant.

Two stationary space stations are separated by a distance of \(100 .\) light- years, as measured by someone on one of the space stations. A spaceship traveling at \(0.950 c\) relative to the space stations passes by one of the space stations heading directly toward the other one. How long will it take to reach the other space station, as measured by someone on the spaceship? How much time will have passed for a traveler on the spaceship as it travels from one space station to the other, as measured by someone on one of the space stations? Round the answers to the nearest year.

The most important fact we learned about aether is that: a) It was experimentally proven not to exist. b) Its existence was proven experimentally. c) It transmits light in all directions equally. d) It transmits light faster in longitudinal direction. e) It transmits light slower in longitudinal direction.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free