a) If you are at the top of a toboggan run that is \(40.0 \mathrm{~m}\) high, how fast will you be going at the bottom, provided you can ignore friction between the sled and the track? b) Does the steepness of the run affect how fast you will be going at the bottom? c) If you do not ignore the small friction force, does the steepness of the track affect the value of the speed at the bottom?

Short Answer

Expert verified
Answer: Without friction, the steepness of the toboggan run does not affect the final speed, as the final speed solely depends on the height of the run and gravitational acceleration. However, when friction is present, a steeper track results in a higher final speed at the bottom, as less contact between the sled and the track occurs during the descent, leading to less energy being lost to friction.

Step by step solution

01

a) Calculate the final speed without friction

To find the speed at the bottom of the toboggan run without friction, we can apply the conservation of mechanical energy. In this case, the potential energy at the top of the run is converted into kinetic energy at the bottom. The formula for the potential energy is \(PE = mgh\), where \(m\) is the mass, \(g\) is the gravitational acceleration (\(9.8 \mathrm{~m/s^2}\)) and \(h\) is the height. At the bottom of the run, all the potential energy is converted into kinetic energy, which is given by \(KE = \frac{1}{2}mv^2\), where \(v\) is the speed at the bottom. Since the initial potential energy is equal to the final kinetic energy, we have: $$mgh = \frac{1}{2}mv^2$$ The mass \(m\) of the toboggan and rider is the same on both sides, so we can simplify the equation and solve for the speed \(v\) at the bottom: $$gh = \frac{1}{2}v^2$$ $$v^2 = 2gh$$ $$v = \sqrt{2gh}$$ Substituting the known values: $$v = \sqrt{2(9.8)(40.0)}$$
02

b) Effect of steepness without friction

As we have found the final speed using the conservation of energy principle, we can see that it only depends on the initial height (\(h\)) and the gravitational acceleration (\(g\)), but not on the steepness of the run. Therefore, the steepness of the run does not affect the final speed at the bottom of the toboggan run when ignoring the friction between the sled and the track.
03

c) Effect of the steepness with friction

If we introduce the effect of friction, the steepness of the track has a significant impact on the final speed. When friction is present, the toboggan loses some of its mechanical energy during the descent. The steeper the track, the less contact between the sled and the track occurs during the descent, leading to less energy being lost to friction. Consequently, a steeper track results in a higher final speed at the bottom of the toboggan run compared to a less steep track, assuming friction exists between the sled and the track.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

A truck of mass 10,212 kg moving at a speed of \(61.2 \mathrm{mph}\) has lost its brakes. Fortunately, the driver finds a runaway lane, a gravel-covered incline that uses friction to stop a truck in such a situation; see the figure. In this case, the incline makes an angle of \(\theta=40.15^{\circ}\) with the horizontal, and the gravel has a coefficient of friction of 0.634 with the tires of the truck. How far along the incline \((\Delta x)\) does the truck travel before it stops?

A body of mass \(m\) moves in one dimension under the influence of a force, \(F(x)\), which depends only on the body's position. a) Prove that Newton's Second Law and the law of conservation of energy for this body are exactly equivalent. b) Explain, then, why the law of conservation of energy is considered to be of greater significance than Newton's Second Law.

How much mechanical energy is lost to friction if a 55.0-kg skier slides down a ski slope at constant speed of \(14.4 \mathrm{~m} / \mathrm{s}\) ? The slope is \(123.5 \mathrm{~m}\) long and makes an angle of \(14.7^{\circ}\) with respect to the horizontal.

A classmate throws a \(1.0-\mathrm{kg}\) book from a height of \(1.0 \mathrm{~m}\) above the ground straight up into the air. The book reaches a maximum height of \(3.0 \mathrm{~m}\) above the ground and begins to fall back. Assume that \(1.0 \mathrm{~m}\) above the ground is the reference level for zero gravitational potential energy. Determine a) the gravitational potential energy of the book when it hits the ground. b) the velocity of the book just before hitting the ground.

A pendulum swings in a vertical plane. At the bottom of the swing, the kinetic energy is \(8 \mathrm{~J}\) and the gravitational potential energy is 4 J. At the highest position of its swing, the kinetic and gravitational potential energies are a) kinetic energy \(=0 \mathrm{~J}\) and gravitational potential energy \(=4 \mathrm{~J}\) b) kinetic energy \(=12 \mathrm{~J}\) and gravitational potential energy \(=0 \mathrm{~J}\) c) kinetic energy \(=0 \mathrm{~J}\) and gravitational potential energy \(=12 \mathrm{~J}\) d) kinetic energy \(=4\) J and gravitational potential energy \(=8 \mathrm{~J}\) e) kinetic energy \(=8 \mathrm{~J}\) and gravitational potential energy \(=4\) J.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free