Which of the following statements about car collisions are true and which are false? a) The essential safety benefit of crumple zones (parts of the front of a car designed to receive maximum deformation during a head-on collision) results from absorbing kinetic energy, converting it into deformation, and lengthening the effective collision time, thus reducing the average force experienced by the driver. b) If car 1 has mass \(m\) and speed \(v\), and car 2 has mass \(0.5 m\) and speed \(1.5 v\), then both cars have the same momentum. c) If two identical cars with identical speeds collide head on, the magnitude of the impulse received by each car and each driver is the same as if one car at the same speed had collided head on with a concrete wall. d) Car 1 has mass \(m,\) and car 2 has mass \(2 m .\) In a head-on collision of these cars while moving at identical speeds in opposite directions, car 1 experiences a bigger acceleration than car 2 . e) Car 1 has mass \(m\), and car 2 has mass \(2 m\). In a headon collision of these cars while moving at identical speeds in opposite directions, car 1 receives an impulse of bigger magnitude than that received by car 2.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Explain your answer.

Step by step solution

01

Statement a

By analyzing the statement, we can see that it refers to crumple zones and their impact on car collisions. The principle being discussed here is the conservation of energy, specifically the conversion of kinetic energy into deformation energy. As the crumple zone is designed to deform during a collision, it helps to absorb kinetic energy by transforming it into deformation energy. This results in longer collision time and reduced average force on the driver. This statement is true.
02

Statement b

In this statement, we need to calculate the momentum of the two cars and compare them to see if they have the same momentum. The momentum (p) of an object is given by its mass times its velocity, that is, \(p=mv\). For car 1, its momentum is \(mv\), while for car 2, its momentum is \((0.5m)(1.5v) = 0.75mv\). As we see, the momenta are not equal, and thus the statement is false.
03

Statement c

The statement refers to the impulse received by a car during a collision. The impulse (J) is given by the change in momentum, and in the case of a head-on collision between two identical cars, it's the same as if one car collided with a concrete wall. Since the cars have identical masses and speeds, their momenta before the collision are equal and opposite. After the collision, their momenta would be zero on both cars, as well as on a car that collides head-on with a concrete wall. Hence, the statement is true.
04

Statement d

The statement discusses acceleration during a head-on collision. The acceleration experienced by either car can be found by using Newton's second law, \(F=ma\). Since they have equal and opposite velocities, and the net force acting on them is equal, we can say that car 1 will experience a greater acceleration due to its lesser mass. So, this statement is true.
05

Statement e

This statement analyzes the impulse experienced by the two cars during a head-on collision. Impulse, the product of force and time, is also equal to the change in momentum. As we saw in the previous step, the net force acting on them is equal. Therefore, since they both experience the same amount of force, the time over which this force acts, and thus the impulse received during the collision, should also be the same for both cars. This statement is false.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Conservation of Energy
Understanding the conservation of energy is fundamental when analyzing car collisions. When two cars collide, the kinetic energy of the vehicles just before the collision is converted into other forms of energy, such as heat, sound, and the energy required to deform the cars. Crumple zones play a vital role in this energy transformation. They are meticulously engineered to crumple in a controlled fashion, absorbing energy and increasing the collision duration.

As a result, the average force exerted on the passengers and drivers is significantly reduced, which is critical in minimizing injuries in an accident. This principle directly correlates with the adage 'it's not the fall that kills you, but the sudden stop at the end.' By lengthening the time over which the stop occurs, the crumple zone spreads the force over a longer period, thereby following the rule that energy must be conserved—transferring kinetic into deformation energy and not disappearing.
Momentum
Momentum is another crucial concept in the physics of car collisions. It is a measure of an object's motion, which is the product of its mass and velocity. Under the principle of conservation of momentum, the total momentum of a system remains constant if no external forces act on it.

In the context of car collisions, when two vehicles crash, the momentum just before the impact must equal the total momentum after the impact, assuming no external forces, like friction or external interventions, significantly affect it. This conservation law helps us predict the outcomes of collisions, such as how vehicles will move post-collision or the forces involved. Misunderstanding momentum, as in the incorrect statement regarding two cars having the same momentum because of different masses and velocities, can lead to a fundamental misinterpretation of the collision dynamics.
Impulse
The impulse delivered during a collision is another aspect illuminated by physics principles. Impulse is the change in momentum of an object and can be calculated as the force applied times the time over which it is applied. It is intimately related to the force experienced by the occupants of a car during a crash.

Equal and Opposite Impulse

When identical cars collide head-on at the same speed, each car experiences an impulse equal in magnitude but opposite in direction to the other's. This is because they exert equal and opposite forces on each other for the same amount of time during the collision, a direct application of Newton's third law of motion. This equality in impulse helps in understanding the effects on each vehicle and in designing safety features for cars.
Newton's Second Law
At the heart of car collision analysis is Newton's second law of motion, which states that the force acting on an object is equal to the mass of the object multiplied by its acceleration (\(F = ma\)). This law helps to understand the acceleration vehicles undergo when forces are applied during a collision.

From this law, we infer that if two cars of different masses collide and the force experienced by each is the same, the car with the lesser mass will have a greater acceleration. In real-world scenarios, this means that lighter vehicles generally sustain greater changes in velocity in a collision, often resulting in more significant damage and higher risks to the occupants. Newton's second law is essential for interpreting the effects of collisions on vehicles of different masses and the resulting accelerations, providing insights for vehicle safety designs and regulations.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Tennis champion Venus Williams is capable of serving a tennis ball at around 127 mph. a) Assuming that her racquet is in contact with the 57.0 -g ball for \(0.250 \mathrm{~s}\), what is the average force of the racquet on the ball? b) What average force would an opponent's racquet have to exert in order to return Williams's serve at a speed of \(50.0 \mathrm{mph}\), assuming that the opponent's racquet is also in contact with the ball for 0.250 s?

A 60.0 -kg astronaut inside a 7.00 -m-long space capsule of mass \(500 . \mathrm{kg}\) is floating weightlessly on one end of the capsule. He kicks off the wall at a velocity of \(3.50 \mathrm{~m} / \mathrm{s}\) toward the other end of the capsule. How long does it take the astronaut to reach the far wall?

A hockey puck \(\left(m=170 . \mathrm{g}\right.\) and \(v_{0}=2.00 \mathrm{~m} / \mathrm{s}\) ) slides without friction on the ice and hits the rink board at \(30.0^{\circ}\) with respect to the normal. The puck bounces off the board at a \(40.0^{\circ}\) angle with respect to the normal. What is the coefficient of restitution for the puck? What is the ratio of the puck's final kinetic energy to its initial kinetic energy?

Some kids are playing a dangerous game with fireworks. They strap several firecrackers to a toy rocket and launch it into the air at an angle of \(60^{\circ}\) with respect to the ground. At the top of its trajectory, the contraption explodes, and the rocket breaks into two equal pieces. One of the pieces has half the speed that the rocket had before it exploded and travels straight upward with respect to the ground. Determine the speed and direction of the second piece.

Using momentum and force principles, explain why an air bag reduces injury in an automobile collision.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free