In deriving the ideal-gas equation from the kinetic molecular model, we ignored potential energy due to the earth’s gravity. Is this omission justified? Why or why not?

Short Answer

Expert verified

Deriving the ideal-gas equation from the kinetic molecular model by ignoring potential energy is justified because the change in potential energy from top to bottom of the container is very small as compared to the average kinetic energy of the molecules.

Step by step solution

01

About the ideal-gas equation and the kinetic molecular model,

The basic ideal gas equation is -

PV=nRT

Where is pressure, V is volume, n is the number of moles, R is gas constant, and T is the absolute temperature.

The theory of treating samples of matter as a large number of small particles (atoms or molecules), all of which are in constant, random motion is known as the kinetic molecular model.

02

Determine the ideal-gas equation from the kinetic molecular model

It is justified if the difference in the gravitational potential energy of an atom at the top and at the bottom of the container is much smaller than the average kinetic energy of the molecule. Let the container’s height be h. Then-

12mv2avgmgh

Here, mis the mass of a molecule of gas vis the average velocity of molecules of gas and gis the acceleration due to gravity.

Therefore, the derivation of the ideal-gas equation from the kinetic molecular model by ignoring potential energy is justified.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Real heat engines, like the gasoline engine in a car, always have some friction between their moving parts, although lubricants keep the friction to a minimum. Would a heat engine with completely frictionless parts be 100%efficient? Why or why not? Does the answer depend on whether or not the engine runs on the Carnot cycle? Again, why or why not?

Does a refrigerator full of food consume more power if the room temperature is 20°Cthan if it is15°C? Or is the power consumption the same? Explain your reasoning.

Imagine a special air filter placed in a window of a house. The tiny holes in the filter allow only air molecules moving faster than a certain speed to exit the house, and allow only air molecules moving slower than that speed to enter the house from outside. What effect would this filter have on the temperature inside the house? (It turns out that the second law of thermodynamics—which we will discuss in Chapter 20—tells us that such a wonderful air filter would be impossible to make.)

Old-time kitchen lore suggests that things cook better (evenly and without burning) in heavy cast-iron pots. What desirable characteristics do such pots have?

Consider two specimens of ideal gas at the same temperature. Specimen A has the same total mass as specimen B, but the molecules in specimen A have greater molar mass than they do in specimen B. In which specimen is the total kinetic energy of the gas greater? Does your answer depend on the molecular structure of the gases? Why or why not?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free