It has been argued that the content of any theory of personality is strongly influenced by the theorist's own personality (e.g., Mindess, 1988 ). Why might a personality theorist want to believe that aspects of his or her personality are shared by everyone?

Short Answer

Expert verified
A personality theorist might believe that aspects of his or her personality are shared by everyone due to the influence of their personal biases, the false-consensus effect, and their psychological need for validation and normalization of their traits.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding Theory Formation

Initially, understand that theory formation often stems from personal beliefs, experiences, and perspectives of the theorist. Hence, personality theories are no exception to this and might be influenced by the theorist's own personality.
02

Bias in Theory

Then, demonstrate the presence of bias. A theorist might assume that traits of their personality are shared by everyone due to a phenomenon known as 'False-Consensus Effect'. This is a cognitive bias in which people overestimate the degree to which their behaviours, values, or beliefs are shared by others.
03

Seeking Validation

Lastly, explain the need for validation. In assuming that everyone shares their traits, the theorist could be seeking validation and normalization for those traits. This further supports their personal theories and beliefs about personality.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The chief executive officer of a major corporation lies to his coworkers and the public, thereby defrauding them of a great deal of money while making millions for himself. A religious leader conceals evidence of child abuse by his subordinates, thereby allowing such abuse to continue. When found out, both individuals steadfastly maintain that they did nothing wrong. (a) Is this an excuse or a rationalization? (b) How might Freud explain this behavior?

Why might a theorist use a construct such as libido, even though it cannot be observed or measured?

The author of a popular textbook on introductory psychology (which I use when I teach that course concludes that the following evidence disproves Freud's construct of repression: "Shouldn't we expect children who have witnessed a parent's murder to repress the experience? A study of sixteen 5- to 10-year-old children who had this horrific experience found that not one repressed the memory. Shouldn't survivors of Nazi death camps have banished the atrocities from consciousness? With rare exceptions, they remember all too well." (Myers, \(2001,\) p. 498 ) Why is the author's conclusion incorrect?

By today's standards, Freud's views of women were clearly biased. To what extent (if any) should criticism of Freud take into account the era in which he lived?

(a) Give an example from your own life of the use of one or more defense mechanisms. (b) What purpose did the defense mechanism(s) serve? (c) Were there any harmful effects? (d) since many of these mechanisms are used unconsciously, how can you (or anyone) know that they actually exist?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Psychology Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free