Log out Go to App
Go to App

Learning Materials

Features

Discover

Chapter 2: Problem 5

Give an example of a parapraxis from your own life, and suggest how Freud might interpret it. How would you interpret it?

Short Answer

Expert verified
Example of parapraxis: Calling someone by a different name. Freud may interpret this mistake as a suppressed or forgotten feeling for the individual you accidentally named. Your own interpretation could be based on recent experiences or preoccupations, for instance, you recently had a conversation with the individual you named, hence the mistake.

Step by step solution

01

Identify an incidence of parapraxis

Firstly, recall a situation where a slip of the tongue, a sudden forgetfulness or a spontaneous action might have occurred – that’s an example of parapraxis.
02

Interpretation based on Freud’s Psychoanalytic Theory

Now, analyze the reviewed situation based on the Freud’s Psychoanalytic Theory. Freud argued that these slip-ups are not actually accidents at all, but rather they provide insight into our unconscious mind. Therefore, make an interpretation how such lapse could be connected to your unconscious desires or thoughts.
03

Your own interpretation

Finally, using your own understanding, interpret the same situation, keeping in view your feelings and thoughts when it occurred. Compare the differences between Freud’s interpretation and your own.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Start your free trial

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Explain how the concept of resistance can be viewed both as a major contribution to our knowledge and as a way for Freud to protect his theory against attack.

The chief executive officer of a major corporation lies to his coworkers and the public, thereby defrauding them of a great deal of money while making millions for himself. A religious leader conceals evidence of child abuse by his subordinates, thereby allowing such abuse to continue. When found out, both individuals steadfastly maintain that they did nothing wrong, (a) Is this an excuse or a rationalization? (b) How might Freud explain this behavior?

How might you (or even Freud himself) use psychoanalytic constructs to make better decisions and live a more fulfilling life?

Consider the following quotes from Chapter \(1:(a)\) "Psychoanalysis is a method of research, an impartial instrument, like the infinitesimal calculus." Do you agree? Why or why not? (b) "[Mental patients] have turned away from external reality, but for that very reason they know more about internal, psychical reality and can reveal a number of things to us that would otherwise be inaccessible to us." Do you agree that studies of mental patients can provide important information about personality in general? Why or why not?

It has been argued that the content of any theory of personality is strongly influenced by the theorist's own personality (e.g., Mindess, 1988 ). Why might a personality theorist want to believe that aspects of his or her personality are shared by everyone?
See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Psychology Textbooks

Careers in Psychology

Read Explanation

Schizophrenia

Read Explanation

Scientific Investigation

Read Explanation

Psychological Treatment

Read Explanation

Social Psychology

Read Explanation

Stress

Read Explanation
View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free