Chapter 5: Problem 2

After he had been working with Paula for several years, Dr. Harpin stopped asking to talk to her alter personalities by name, preferring instead to address only Paula. Should he have adopted that strategy from the beginning of the case? Do you think his willingness to talk to her using different names could have contributed to the problem? Or did it help him sort out the problem and establish a strong working relationship with his client?

Short Answer

Expert verified

Dr. Harpin's initial approach of addressing Paula's alter personalities by name may have helped him better understand her condition and establish a strong working relationship with her. However, eventually addressing only Paula could signify a shift towards integrating the personalities and facilitating a healing process. While it is difficult to definitively say if one strategy should have been adopted from the beginning, it is possible that the combined approach of acknowledging the alters and later focusing on Paula helped in the treatment process by establishing trust and promoting integration.

Step by step solution

Understand the case background

To properly analyze this situation, it's crucial to have a clear understanding of the case background. Research and gather information regarding Paula's case, Dr. Harpin's approach, and any details about their sessions.

Evaluate the initial approach of addressing alter personalities by name

Once you have a solid grasp of the case background, examine the potential effects of Dr. Harpin initially addressing alter personalities by name. Consider the possible reasons why he might have done so and whether it could have contributed to the problem. Think about the potential impact on Paula and her alter personalities.

Assess the decision to address only Paula later in the treatment

Next, evaluate the decision to address only Paula after several years. Ask yourself if this was a better approach and why Dr. Harpin might have made that decision. Consider the potential benefits and drawbacks for the treatment process and outcomes.

Determine if the initial approach established a strong working relationship

With the understanding of both approaches, determine whether starting by addressing alter personalities by name could have helped establish a strong working relationship with Paula and her alters. Discuss your rationale for your conclusion.

Form your opinion on whether this strategy should have been adopted from the beginning

After evaluating both approaches and the potential effects on the therapeutic relationship, make a judgment as to whether Dr. Harpin should have adopted the strategy of addressing only Paula from the very start of the case. Explain your reasoning, taking into account the potential benefits and drawbacks of the initial and later approaches.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

Full Textbook Solutions
Get detailed explanations and key concepts
Unlimited Al creation
Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...
Ads-free access
To over 500 millions flashcards
Money-back guarantee
We refund you if you fail your exam.

Start your free trial

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Recommended explanations on Psychology Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Short Answer

Step by step solution

Understand the case background

Evaluate the initial approach of addressing alter personalities by name

Assess the decision to address only Paula later in the treatment

Determine if the initial approach established a strong working relationship

Form your opinion on whether this strategy should have been adopted from the beginning

One App. One Place for Learning.

Most popular questions from this chapter

Recommended explanations on Psychology Textbooks

Social Psychology

Gender

Psychological Treatment

Research Methods in Psychology

Scientific Investigation

Biopsychology

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.