Chapter 2: Problem 58
The competition between Britain and Germany to have the larger fleet and the most battleships was an example of which of these causative factors? A. arms race among great powers B. competition for raw materials and new markets C. sense of grievances
Short Answer
Expert verified
A. arms race among great powers
Step by step solution
01
- Understand the Question
Read the question carefully to understand what it is asking. The question is focusing on the competition between Britain and Germany to have the larger fleet and more battleships.
02
- Identify Key Terms
Identify key terms such as 'competition', 'larger fleet', and 'battleships'. These are important in understanding what the competition was about.
03
- Define the Options
Define each of the given options: A. Arms race among great powers refers to a competition to build up a superior military force. B. Competition for raw materials and new markets refers to economic rivalry for resources and trade opportunities. C. Sense of grievances refers to feelings of injustice or resentment that might lead to conflict.
04
- Analyze the Context
Analyze the historical context of Britain and Germany's competition to build a larger fleet. This competition was primarily about military strength and naval power, indicating an arms race.
05
- Match the Context to the Options
Compare the historical context with the defined options. The competition for a larger fleet and more battleships aligns closely with the concept of an 'arms race among great powers'.
06
- Conclude the Answer
Based on the historical context and the definitions, conclude that the competition between Britain and Germany for a larger fleet and more battleships is an example of an arms race among great powers.
Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!
-
Full Textbook Solutions
Get detailed explanations and key concepts
-
Unlimited Al creation
Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...
-
Ads-free access
To over 500 millions flashcards
-
Money-back guarantee
We refund you if you fail your exam.
Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!
Key Concepts
These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.
arms race
An arms race is a period of intense military buildup by competing nations or groups. It often involves rapid advancements in military technology and increases in numbers of troops and weapons.
An arms race can create tension and distrust among nations, making conflicts more likely.
Historically, the arms race between Britain and Germany before World War I is a classic example. Both nations were striving to outdo each other by building larger and more powerful battleships.
Understanding arms races helps explain how military competition can escalate and lead to broader conflicts.
An arms race can create tension and distrust among nations, making conflicts more likely.
Historically, the arms race between Britain and Germany before World War I is a classic example. Both nations were striving to outdo each other by building larger and more powerful battleships.
- The Dreadnought: A revolutionary class of battleships introduced by Britain in 1906.
- Mutual fear: Both countries feared falling behind in naval power and sought dominance.
Understanding arms races helps explain how military competition can escalate and lead to broader conflicts.
military competition
Military competition involves countries striving to outmatch each other in terms of military capability. This can include the size of armies, technological advancements, and overall military strategy.
A key aspect of military competition is the pursuit of strategic advantage. Nations invest heavily in military research and development to gain superiority over potential adversaries.
Military competition does not always lead to direct conflict, but it can result in high levels of preparedness and tensions between nations.
A key aspect of military competition is the pursuit of strategic advantage. Nations invest heavily in military research and development to gain superiority over potential adversaries.
- Technological advancements: Innovations in weaponry and defense systems.
- Resource allocation: Significant portions of national budgets dedicated to defense.
Military competition does not always lead to direct conflict, but it can result in high levels of preparedness and tensions between nations.
naval power
Naval power refers to a nation's ability to project its military strength and influence over the seas. This can include having a large and modern fleet of warships, submarines, and maritime logistics.
The importance of naval power lies in controlling trade routes, ensuring national security, and projecting force globally.
Naval power remains crucial in modern times for enforcing maritime law, combating piracy, and providing humanitarian aid during crises.
The importance of naval power lies in controlling trade routes, ensuring national security, and projecting force globally.
- Control of sea lanes: Dominance over important sea routes for trade and military movement.
- Strategic bases: Establishing naval bases around the world to support operations.
Naval power remains crucial in modern times for enforcing maritime law, combating piracy, and providing humanitarian aid during crises.
Great Power rivalry
Great Power rivalry involves major world powers competing for global influence and dominance. This can encompass military, economic, political, and cultural dimensions.
Such rivalries often shape international relations and can have widespread implications for smaller nations.
Understanding Great Power rivalry helps in analyzing current international tensions and anticipating potential conflicts or shifts in the global order.
Such rivalries often shape international relations and can have widespread implications for smaller nations.
- Economic competition: Struggles for control over resources and markets.
- Alliances: Formation of strategic partnerships to counterbalance rivals.
Understanding Great Power rivalry helps in analyzing current international tensions and anticipating potential conflicts or shifts in the global order.