Read the following quotation from one of the decisions
of the Warren Court:
“The right to be heard would be, in many cases, of little
avail if it did not comprehend the right to be heard by
counsel. Even the intelligent and educated layman has
small and sometimes no skill in the science of law. If
charged with crime, he is incapable, generally, of
determining for himself whether the indictment is good or
bad. He is unfamiliar with the rules of evidence. Left without
the aid of counsel, he may be put on trial without a proper
charge, and convicted upon incompetent evidence, or
evidence irrelevant to the issue or otherwise inadmissible.
He lacks both the skill and knowledge adequately to prepare
his defense, even though he have a perfect one. He requires
the guiding hand of counsel at every step in the proceedings
against him. Without it, though he be not guilty, he faces
the danger of conviction because he does not know how to
establish his innocence.”
In which case was the Court most likely to use these
words to explain its decision?
A. Escobedo v. Illinois
B. Gideon v. Wainwright
C. Mapp v. Ohio
D. Miranda v. Arizona